House justice committee examines substance of Marcos impeachment complaints

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

On Monday, February 2, 2026, the House justice committee, chaired by Rep. Gerville Luistro, voted that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. The complaint filed by private lawyer Andre de Jesus passed 46-1, with one abstention. The Makabayan bloc's complaint, led by former congresswoman Liza Maza, passed 35-9, with one abstention.

Rep. Bienvenido Abante was the sole dissenter, arguing the complaints lacked form and wasted public funds. Rep. Rufus Rodriguez questioned the Makabayan complaint's verification due to missing notarization, but the vote proceeded after confirming both followed the same format.

On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 10 a.m., the committee resumes to evaluate the complaints' substance, including allegations of corruption in public works projects, budget irregularities, enabling former President Rodrigo Duterte's arrest and transfer to The Hague, and claims of drug addiction in Jett Nisay's endorsement. If approved, this would initiate the first impeachment proceeding of the 20th Congress, notifying Marcos to respond.

Rep. Ysabel Maria Zamora stated the recent Supreme Court ruling on Vice President Sara Duterte's case has no effect, as these complaints were filed by ordinary citizens and endorsed by House members, unlike Duterte's. Reps. Luistro and Keith Flores agreed. House Senior Deputy Majority Leader Lorenz Defensor emphasized the House is not bound by SC rulings on impeachment rules due to separation of powers, following the 1987 Constitution's intent instead.

Constitutional framer Rene Sarmiento criticized the SC decision as judicial overreach that hinders future impeachments. From Malacañang, Presidential Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said Marcos committed no impeachable offense but is concerned about economic impacts. 'He did nothing wrong, but it will affect the whole country,' she said.

相关文章

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
AI 生成的图像

最高法院维持驳回萨拉副总统首次弹劾

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

最高法院裁定副总统萨拉·杜特尔特的首次弹劾案因违反一年禁令规则和正当程序而违宪。该院澄清,现在可以立即提交新投诉。杜特尔特的律师已为潜在未来诉讼做好准备。

众议院司法委员会以缺乏实质内容为由驳回了针对费迪南德·马科斯总统的兩项弹劾投诉。Dwight de Leon在Rappler Recap中解释了接下来会发生什么,以及该决定是否可以逆转。

由 AI 报道

与针对副总统萨拉·杜特尔特的申诉不同,对总统费迪南德“邦邦”马科斯 Jr. 的弹劾申诉在提交仅两天后就被送往众议院议长办公室。众议院秘书长切洛伊·贝利卡里亚-加拉菲尔于1月21日证实了此事。这一迅速传输引发疑问,即这是否对总统针对未来申诉有利。

众议院准备从2月6日起接收并处理针对副总统Sara Duterte的任何弹劾投诉,公共账户委员会主席Terry Ridon表示。这是在最高法院澄清弹劾快速通道备案通知要求后的决定。该法院针对Duterte的为期一年禁令将于该日期到期。

由 AI 报道

最高法院通过裁定副总统萨拉·杜特尔特的弹劾违宪,重塑了未来弹劾案件的启动和评估方式。在2025年7月25日的裁决中,最高法院援引众议院的无所作为和缺乏正当程序作为废止该弹劾的理由。它还为今后的弹劾制定了新标准。

在不断变化的政治格局中,费迪南德·“邦邦”·马科斯二世总统面临破坏其政府的企图,但结构性变革使得未经宪法程序难以将其赶下台。经济稳定和制度改革已中和了传统的下台途径,如军事干预或大规模抗议。弹劾仍是唯一可行的机制,但当前国会面临重大障碍。

由 AI 报道

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. underwent a major cabinet shake-up last week amid a corruption scandal involving flood control projects. Officials like Lucas Bersamin and Amenah Pangandaman were forced to resign or were fired, as political tensions escalate with drug allegations against the Marcos family. These developments highlight a deepening crisis challenging his leadership.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝