House justice committee examines substance of Marcos impeachment complaints

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

On Monday, February 2, 2026, the House justice committee, chaired by Rep. Gerville Luistro, voted that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. The complaint filed by private lawyer Andre de Jesus passed 46-1, with one abstention. The Makabayan bloc's complaint, led by former congresswoman Liza Maza, passed 35-9, with one abstention.

Rep. Bienvenido Abante was the sole dissenter, arguing the complaints lacked form and wasted public funds. Rep. Rufus Rodriguez questioned the Makabayan complaint's verification due to missing notarization, but the vote proceeded after confirming both followed the same format.

On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, at 10 a.m., the committee resumes to evaluate the complaints' substance, including allegations of corruption in public works projects, budget irregularities, enabling former President Rodrigo Duterte's arrest and transfer to The Hague, and claims of drug addiction in Jett Nisay's endorsement. If approved, this would initiate the first impeachment proceeding of the 20th Congress, notifying Marcos to respond.

Rep. Ysabel Maria Zamora stated the recent Supreme Court ruling on Vice President Sara Duterte's case has no effect, as these complaints were filed by ordinary citizens and endorsed by House members, unlike Duterte's. Reps. Luistro and Keith Flores agreed. House Senior Deputy Majority Leader Lorenz Defensor emphasized the House is not bound by SC rulings on impeachment rules due to separation of powers, following the 1987 Constitution's intent instead.

Constitutional framer Rene Sarmiento criticized the SC decision as judicial overreach that hinders future impeachments. From Malacañang, Presidential Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said Marcos committed no impeachable offense but is concerned about economic impacts. 'He did nothing wrong, but it will affect the whole country,' she said.

مقالات ذات صلة

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
صورة مولدة بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي صورة مولدة بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Unlike complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, the impeachment complaint against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. was sent to the House speaker's office just two days after filing. House Secretary General Cheloy Velicaria-Garafil confirmed this on January 21. The swift transmission raises questions about whether it benefits the president against future complaints.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

The House of Representatives defended its decision not to accept impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. due to strict procedural rules. The complaints were turned away because Secretary General Cheloy Garafil was abroad. Lawmakers emphasized the formal nature of the process.

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

The Supreme Court did not rule the entire 2024 General Appropriations Act (GAA) unconstitutional or declare impeachment grounds against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Instead, it struck down a special provision on PhilHealth funds and upheld Marcos' certification of urgency. However, in his separate opinion, Justice Marvic Leonen argued that Marcos committed grave abuse of discretion.

The Office of the Ombudsman has filed two sets of cases related to the multibillion-peso flood control scam, but none involve high-ranking officials. This forms part of a thorough investigation under new Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla. The cases stem from projects in Oriental Mindoro and Davao Occidental worth over P386 million.

من إعداد الذكاء الاصطناعي

STF Minister Gilmar Mendes suspended parts of the 1950 Impeachment Law, restricting impeachment requests for ministers to only the PGR and raising the required Senate quorum. The move prompted an immediate reaction from Senate President Davi Alcolumbre, who defended the Legislature's prerogatives and threatened constitutional changes. The Lula government, through the AGU, requested reconsideration until plenary judgment.

 

 

 

يستخدم هذا الموقع ملفات تعريف الارتباط

نستخدم ملفات تعريف الارتباط للتحليلات لتحسين موقعنا. اقرأ سياسة الخصوصية الخاصة بنا سياسة الخصوصية لمزيد من المعلومات.
رفض