Government discloses 8639 complaints against judges in Lok Sabha

Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal informed the Lok Sabha that between 2016 and 2025, the Chief Justice of India's office received 8639 complaints against sitting judges. The highest number, 1170, were recorded in 2024 alone. The government clarified that such complaints are handled through the judiciary's in-house mechanism.

In New Delhi on February 14, 2026, Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal presented data on complaints related to the judiciary in a written reply to a question in the Lok Sabha. He stated that from 2016 to 2025, a total of 8639 complaints against sitting judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts were received by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) office.

The year 2024 saw the highest number with 1170 complaints. The minister explained that investigations and actions on these complaints are conducted under the judiciary's internal in-house mechanism, without direct government intervention.

Meghwal referenced two key Supreme Court resolutions from May 1997. The first is the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life, which sets conduct standards for judges. The second is the in-house procedure, providing for steps against judges who violate these standards.

Under this process, complaints against Supreme Court judges and High Court Chief Justices are sent directly to the CJI. Complaints against other High Court judges are handled by the respective High Court Chief Justice. Additionally, complaints received via CPGRAMS (Centralized Public Grievance Redress and Monitoring System) or other channels are forwarded to these authorities.

This disclosure may fuel discussions on judicial accountability, though the government emphasized that the process remains entirely within the judiciary's domain.

Relaterade artiklar

South Korea's Supreme Court with banner announcing judicial reform laws taking effect on March 12, enabling constitutional appeals; judges and politicians celebrating.
Bild genererad av AI

South Korea's judicial reform laws take effect, enabling constitutional appeals

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

South Korea's judicial reform laws were proclaimed on March 12, allowing constitutional appeals against Supreme Court rulings and punishment for legal distortion. This marks the first major overhaul since the 1987 constitutional amendment, including an expansion of Supreme Court justices. The measures passed under the ruling Democratic Party despite opposition from the opposition and judiciary.

The Jharkhand High Court has directed the state government to file a detailed affidavit clarifying whether mandatory judicial inquiries were conducted in nearly 450 custodial deaths reported between 2018 and 2025. This order came during a hearing on a public interest litigation filed in 2022. The court emphasized the need to ensure compliance with legal safeguards to rule out foul play.

Rapporterad av AI

One week after South Korea's judicial reform laws took effect on March 12—introducing constitutional appeals and penalties for 'law distortion'—complaints against top judges have risen sharply. The National Assembly is set to vote Thursday on the remaining two bills of the 'judiciary trio,' prompting fears of paralyzing the judiciary.

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court directed the Election Commission to freeze West Bengal's voter rolls and publish the supplementary list by midnight after noting that adjudication of claims from voters deleted during the Special Intensive Revision was nearly complete. The court refused to set a deadline for appellate tribunals, stressing the need to freeze the lists now.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court announced on April 2 that it will commence regular hearings on the Bhojshala temple-Kamal Maula mosque dispute cases in Dhar from April 6. The decision follows the Supreme Court's refusal on April 1 to intervene in a Muslim side petition, directing the High Court to address all parties' objections.

Rapporterad av AI

A controversial chapter in the Class 8 NCERT social science textbook mentioning corruption in the judiciary was written by a committee including a lawyer but was not reviewed by any legal experts, officials said on Thursday. The Supreme Court has called for action against those who wrote the chapter, and Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan has promised strict measures.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj