Supreme Court to hear suo motu case on NCERT textbook's judiciary corruption chapter

The Supreme Court is set to hear a suo motu case over the inclusion of a chapter on corruption in the judiciary in NCERT's Class 8 Social Science textbook. NCERT has apologised for the inappropriate textual material and stopped the book's distribution. A three-judge bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will conduct the hearing on February 26, 2026.

On February 26, 2026, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a suo motu case in the morning regarding the inclusion of a chapter titled 'The Role of the Judiciary in Our Society' in NCERT's newest Social Science textbook for Class 8. The chapter addresses corruption in the judiciary.

The hearing will be before a three-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi, and Justice Vipul M. Pancholi. The case is titled 'In Re: Social Science Textbook for Grade-8 (Part 2) published by NCERT and ancillary issues'.

The textbook mentions corruption, a massive backlog of cases, and a lack of adequate number of judges as challenges faced by the judicial system. The section on corruption in the judiciary states that judges are bound by a code of conduct that governs not only their behaviour in court but also how they conduct themselves outside of it.

Hours after the top court took note, NCERT issued a statement apologising for the inappropriate textual material and error in judgement. NCERT said the textbook was brought out as per extant procedure, but the issues were observed upon receiving the textbook. The Department of School Education also made similar observations. The directions to stop the distribution of the book have been complied with.

Relaterade artiklar

Somber NCERT officials withdrawing controversial class 8 social science textbook banned by Supreme Court over judicial corruption chapter.
Bild genererad av AI

NCERT drar tillbaka samhällskunskapslärobok för klass 8 på grund av kapitel om rättsväsendet

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

Nationalrådet för utbildningsforskning och utbildning (NCERT) har dragit tillbaka sin nyligen utgivna samhällskunskapslärobok för klass 8 efter kontrovers kring ett kapitel om rättslig korruption. Högsta domstolen införde ett totalförbud mot vidare publicering och spridning. NCERT uttryckte beklagande över den oavsiktliga inkluderingen av olämpligt innehåll.

A controversial chapter in the Class 8 NCERT social science textbook mentioning corruption in the judiciary was written by a committee including a lawyer but was not reviewed by any legal experts, officials said on Thursday. The Supreme Court has called for action against those who wrote the chapter, and Union education minister Dharmendra Pradhan has promised strict measures.

Rapporterad av AI

Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal informed the Lok Sabha that between 2016 and 2025, the Chief Justice of India's office received 8639 complaints against sitting judges. The highest number, 1170, were recorded in 2024 alone. The government clarified that such complaints are handled through the judiciary's in-house mechanism.

In November, the Delhi High Court ruled that no law student can be barred from exams due to insufficient attendance. This decision has ignited debate on academic rigour and classroom teaching in higher education. Critics argue it undermines the essential role of physical classes.

Rapporterad av AI

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

In the Unnao rape case, the CBI has filed a special leave petition in the Supreme Court against the Delhi High Court's order suspending the life sentence of convicted former BJP MLA Kuldeep Singh Sengar. The agency has termed the High Court decision as against the law, citing risks to the victim's safety. The case reached the apex court following the High Court's ruling on December 23, 2025.

Rapporterad av AI

The supreme court on Tuesday observed a major flaw in the ongoing removal proceedings in Parliament against justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad high court. He is at the centre of a controversy following the recovery of cash from his official residence in Delhi.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj