Marcos impeachment complaint reaches speaker's office in days

Unlike complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, the impeachment complaint against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. was sent to the House speaker's office just two days after filing. House Secretary General Cheloy Velicaria-Garafil confirmed this on January 21. The swift transmission raises questions about whether it benefits the president against future complaints.

On January 19, lawyer Andre de Jesus filed an impeachment complaint against Marcos, endorsed by Rep. Jett Nisay of the Pusong Pinoy Party-list. The grounds include culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and betrayal of public trust. Accusations involve orchestrating the arrest and transfer of former President Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court, authorizing unprogrammed appropriations, receiving kickbacks, creating the Independent Commission for Infrastructure to protect allies, and illegal drug use.

House Secretary General Cheloy Velicaria-Garafil transmitted the complaint to Speaker Faustino “Bojie” G. Dy III in line with House rules. It must be included in the Order of Business within 10 session days and referred to the Committee on Justice within three session days after.

In contrast, the first three complaints against Duterte in December 2024 were archived until February 2025, when a fourth was filed by more than one-third of House members.

Several lawmakers doubt the complaint against Marcos will succeed, citing lack of evidence. Speaker Dy stated it "seems to have no merit," but the House will process it dutifully. If it fails after initiation, no further complaints can be entertained in the same year.

Consequently, the Makabayan bloc plans to endorse another citizen-filed complaint on January 22. Bayan President Renato Reyes said, "We expect that this verified complaint will be transmitted to the Speaker and included in the order of business, and not be excluded in favor of what many are saying is a weak first complaint intended to shield the President."

The early transmission, before Congress resumes on January 26, may advantage Marcos by potentially resolving the process quickly and blocking attempts until 2027.

Relaterade artiklar

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
Bild genererad av AI

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Anti-corruption advocates attempted to file a second impeachment complaint against President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Marcos Jr. on January 22 over alleged betrayal of public trust, but the House Office of the Secretary General refused it because Secretary General Cheloy Garafil was unavailable.

Rapporterad av AI

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. ordered the Department of Public Works and Highways and the Independent Commission for Infrastructure to hand over all evidence from their probe into anomalous flood control projects to the Ombudsman. This accompanies the agencies' recommendation to file plunder, graft, and bribery charges against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez and former congressman Zaldy Co. The Ombudsman's decision will be based on evidence from contracts and testimonies.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

In a shifting political landscape, President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. faces attempts to destabilize his administration, but structural changes make removal unlikely without constitutional processes. Economic stability and institutional reforms have neutralized traditional paths to ouster like military intervention or mass protests. Impeachment remains the only viable mechanism, though it faces significant hurdles in the current Congress.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court did not rule the entire 2024 General Appropriations Act (GAA) unconstitutional or declare impeachment grounds against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Instead, it struck down a special provision on PhilHealth funds and upheld Marcos' certification of urgency. However, in his separate opinion, Justice Marvic Leonen argued that Marcos committed grave abuse of discretion.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj