Marcos' presence at impeachment hearings left to legal team

Malacañang is leaving it to President Marcos' legal team to decide whether he will attend the House of Representatives' justice committee hearings on the impeachment complaint against him. The deliberations are set to begin on Feb. 2, and the president may be invited if the complaints are deemed sufficient in form and substance. Officials emphasized that attendance is the president's prerogative.

MANILA, Philippines — The House justice committee, led by Batangas 2nd district Rep. Gerville Luistro, is preparing to begin deliberations on two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. on Feb. 2, 2026. The hearings will take place at 10 a.m. at the People’s Center in the Batasan complex.

Luistro stated that the president would be invited to the hearings if the complaints are found sufficient in form and substance, but attendance is his prerogative. “It depends on the legal team of the President, whether there is a need for that,” Presidential Communications Undersecretary Claire Castro said during a press briefing.

The first complaint, filed by lawyer Andre de Jesus and endorsed by Pusong Pinoy party-list Rep. Jett Nisay, accuses Marcos of the “kidnapping” and surrender of former president Rodrigo Duterte to the International Criminal Court, failing to veto unconstitutional provisions in the past four national budgets, and forming the Independent Commission for Infrastructure to shield allies from corruption.

The second complaint from the Makabayan bloc, endorsed by ACT Teachers party-list Rep. Antonio Tinio, Gabriela party-list Rep. Sarah Elago, and Kabataan party-list Rep. Renee Co, charges Marcos with betrayal of public trust for using the baselined-balanced-managed parametric formula that allegedly enables kickbacks in state infrastructure projects.

Luistro is keen on consolidating the two complaints, but retired Supreme Court associate justice Adolf Azcuna noted it is up to the committee whether to merge or treat them separately. He added that this referral triggers a one-year ban on filing another impeachment complaint. “The report of the committee to the House will be the one that will be followed,” Azcuna said.

A third complaint linked to Vice President Sara Duterte's group was rejected by the House Secretary General's office due to the chief's absence during submission. “We were surprised that the Office of the Secretary General refused to accept our impeachment complaint,” lawyer Ferdinand Topacio remarked.

The process follows constitutional guidelines, and Congress may adapt rules for handling simultaneous complaints against the president and vice president, according to Azcuna.

Relaterade artiklar

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
Bild genererad av AI

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

Rapporterad av AI

The House of Representatives defended its decision not to accept impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. due to strict procedural rules. The complaints were turned away because Secretary General Cheloy Garafil was abroad. Lawmakers emphasized the formal nature of the process.

The House of Representatives is ready to receive and act on any impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte starting February 6, public accounts committee chair Terry Ridon said. This follows the Supreme Court's decision clarifying notice requirements for the express route of impeachment filing. The court's one-year bar rule against Duterte lapses on that date.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court has reshaped how future impeachment cases will be initiated and assessed by ruling Vice President Sara Duterte’s impeachment unconstitutional. In its July 25, 2025 decision, the high court cited the House’s inaction and lack of due process as grounds for voiding it. It also laid down new standards for impeachments going forward.

The Senate ethics committee will review a proposal to suspend the salary of Sen. Ronald dela Rosa, who is in hiding amid an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court.

Rapporterad av AI

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. ordered the Department of Public Works and Highways and the Independent Commission for Infrastructure to hand over all evidence from their probe into anomalous flood control projects to the Ombudsman. This accompanies the agencies' recommendation to file plunder, graft, and bribery charges against former House Speaker Martin Romualdez and former congressman Zaldy Co. The Ombudsman's decision will be based on evidence from contracts and testimonies.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj