Supreme Court

Follow
Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz testifying in Supreme Court over email leak scandal, with judges and courtroom details.

Attorney general testifies in Supreme Court over Ayuso partner email leak

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz denied before Judge Ángel Hurtado leaking a confidential email from Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner in a tax fraud case. Alberto González Amador and Miguel Ángel Rodríguez also testified, revealing details on authorizations and hoaxes in the proceedings. The statements highlight tensions in the Prosecutor's Office and prior leaks in the case.

Aldama reveals 20,000 euros in undeclared payments to Ábalos for Valencia property

Carmen González

Businessman Víctor de Aldama has informed the Supreme Court that he paid 20,000 euros in cash to José Luis Ábalos for buying a property in Valencia, part of four million euros in commissions. Aldama claims some of that money financed the PSOE and Koldo García used a diplomatic passport to move funds abroad. The submission questions the 2020 notarial formalization of the real estate deal.

U.S. Supreme Court exterior during hearing on Louisiana redistricting under Voting Rights Act, with lawyers, protesters, and district map.

Supreme Court examines Louisiana redistricting under Voting Rights Act

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 15, 2025, in Callais v. Louisiana, a case challenging whether creating a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Constitution. Conservative justices appeared inclined to limit Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, potentially allowing Republicans to gain up to 19 House seats. The ruling could reshape minority representation in Congress.

Trump administration seeks Supreme Court intervention for Chicago National Guard deployment

Petra Hartmann

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow National Guard troops to deploy in Chicago to safeguard federal immigration enforcement amid ongoing protests. This emergency appeal follows a federal judge's ruling that blocked such deployment, citing insufficient evidence of rebellion. The filing highlights violent resistance to federal agents and escalates tensions with Illinois state officials.

Protesters and lawyers outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments on the future of the Voting Rights Act's Section 2.

Supreme Court hears arguments on Voting Rights Act's future

Petra Hartmann Image generated by AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Callais v. Louisiana, a case that could restrict or end Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The arguments focused on whether creating majority-minority districts violates the 14th and 15th Amendments. Civil rights advocates warn of catastrophic consequences for multiracial democracy.

Lawyers ask STF to appoint black woman for Barroso's vacancy

João Silva

A group of São Paulo lawyers filed a writ of mandamus at the Supreme Federal Court to prevent President Lula from appointing a white man to the vacancy left by Luís Roberto Barroso's retirement. They argue that appointing a black woman is required by international human rights treaties. The action aims to promote racial and gender equality in the Court.

Photo illustration depicting the demolition of the White House East Wing as a metaphor for threats to the Justice Department under Trump and Bondi, featuring a bulldozer, symbolic justice elements, and references to the Amicus podcast and Vance's book.

Amicus episode ‘Demolition Man’ probes threats to the Justice Department amid East Wing demolition

Petra Hartmann Image generated by AI Fact checked

In a new episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick and guest Joyce White Vance discuss the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Donald Trump, using the week’s bulldozer imagery—and the real demolition of the White House’s East Wing—as a backdrop to examine pursuits of political opponents and congressional inaction. Vance’s new book outlines how citizens can help sustain democratic institutions.

Supreme Court hears arguments on Colorado conversion therapy ban

Reported by AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 7, 2025, in Chiles v. Salazar, a challenge to Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for minors. Christian counselor Kaley Chiles argues the law violates her First Amendment rights by restricting speech aimed at helping children with gender identity issues. Justices raised concerns about free speech, medical consensus, and viewpoint discrimination during the 90-minute session.

Supreme court approves first judicial ethics code after hermosilla case

Chile's Supreme Court approved its first Judicial Code of Ethics during the 2025 Reflection Days, in response to the Hermosilla case scandal. The document, drafted by Minister Adelita Ravanales, is consultative and establishes an Ethics Council to guide judges' conduct. It applies to jurisdictional roles and addresses challenges like artificial intelligence use.

Supreme court backs declassifying only three documents on aragonès spying

Spain's Supreme Court has endorsed the government's decision to declassify only three documents linked to the spying on Pere Aragonès's phone using the Pegasus program. The ruling dismisses the Catalan government's appeal, which sought more details to safeguard national security. The court warns that broader declassification would endanger the rule of law.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline