Supreme Court

Sundin
Protesters and lawyers outside the U.S. Supreme Court during oral arguments on the future of the Voting Rights Act's Section 2.

Supreme Court hears arguments on Voting Rights Act's future

Petra Hartmann Larawang ginawa ng AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Callais v. Louisiana, a case that could restrict or end Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The arguments focused on whether creating majority-minority districts violates the 14th and 15th Amendments. Civil rights advocates warn of catastrophic consequences for multiracial democracy.

Trump administration seeks Supreme Court intervention for Chicago National Guard deployment

Petra Hartmann

The Trump administration has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow National Guard troops to deploy in Chicago to safeguard federal immigration enforcement amid ongoing protests. This emergency appeal follows a federal judge's ruling that blocked such deployment, citing insufficient evidence of rebellion. The filing highlights violent resistance to federal agents and escalates tensions with Illinois state officials.

Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz testifying in Supreme Court over email leak scandal, with judges and courtroom details.

Attorney general testifies in Supreme Court over Ayuso partner email leak

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI

Attorney General Álvaro García Ortiz denied before Judge Ángel Hurtado leaking a confidential email from Isabel Díaz Ayuso's partner in a tax fraud case. Alberto González Amador and Miguel Ángel Rodríguez also testified, revealing details on authorizations and hoaxes in the proceedings. The statements highlight tensions in the Prosecutor's Office and prior leaks in the case.

Supreme Court hears arguments on Colorado conversion therapy ban

Iniulat ng AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 7, 2025, in Chiles v. Salazar, a challenge to Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for minors. Christian counselor Kaley Chiles argues the law violates her First Amendment rights by restricting speech aimed at helping children with gender identity issues. Justices raised concerns about free speech, medical consensus, and viewpoint discrimination during the 90-minute session.

U.S. Supreme Court exterior during hearing on Louisiana redistricting under Voting Rights Act, with lawyers, protesters, and district map.

Supreme Court examines Louisiana redistricting under Voting Rights Act

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 15, 2025, in Callais v. Louisiana, a case challenging whether creating a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Constitution. Conservative justices appeared inclined to limit Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, potentially allowing Republicans to gain up to 19 House seats. The ruling could reshape minority representation in Congress.

Aldama reveals 20,000 euros in undeclared payments to Ábalos for Valencia property

Carmen González

Businessman Víctor de Aldama has informed the Supreme Court that he paid 20,000 euros in cash to José Luis Ábalos for buying a property in Valencia, part of four million euros in commissions. Aldama claims some of that money financed the PSOE and Koldo García used a diplomatic passport to move funds abroad. The submission questions the 2020 notarial formalization of the real estate deal.

Photo illustration depicting the demolition of the White House East Wing as a metaphor for threats to the Justice Department under Trump and Bondi, featuring a bulldozer, symbolic justice elements, and references to the Amicus podcast and Vance's book.

Amicus episode ‘Demolition Man’ probes threats to the Justice Department amid East Wing demolition

Petra Hartmann Larawang ginawa ng AI Fact checked

In a new episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick and guest Joyce White Vance discuss the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Donald Trump, using the week’s bulldozer imagery—and the real demolition of the White House’s East Wing—as a backdrop to examine pursuits of political opponents and congressional inaction. Vance’s new book outlines how citizens can help sustain democratic institutions.

Lawyers ask STF to appoint black woman for Barroso's vacancy

João Silva

A group of São Paulo lawyers filed a writ of mandamus at the Supreme Federal Court to prevent President Lula from appointing a white man to the vacancy left by Luís Roberto Barroso's retirement. They argue that appointing a black woman is required by international human rights treaties. The action aims to promote racial and gender equality in the Court.

Man arrested with explosives outside D.C. church's Red Mass

Washington, D.C., police arrested Louis Geri on October 5 outside the Cathedral of St. Matthew the Apostle during preparations for the annual Red Mass honoring the Supreme Court. The 41-year-old man possessed over 200 explosive devices and a manifesto expressing animosity toward the Catholic Church, Supreme Court justices, and others. He faces multiple charges, including possession of destructive devices and hate crimes.

Former sheriff Joe Arpaio claims Supreme Court vindication on racial profiling

Former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, known for his aggressive immigration enforcement, says a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling clears him of past racial profiling charges. The 93-year-old retired lawman points to the court's shadow docket decision in Noem v. Vasquez Perdomo as legalizing tactics similar to those that led to his 2017 pardon by Donald Trump. Arpaio views the 6-3 ruling as a direct endorsement of his methods.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan