New Mexico jury fines Meta $375 million in child safety case

A jury in New Mexico ruled Meta liable for violating the state's consumer protection laws, ordering the company to pay a $375 million penalty. The verdict stems from allegations that Meta misled users about platform safety amid child exploitation risks. Meta plans to appeal the decision.

A New Mexico jury found Meta liable on all counts in a civil trial brought by state Attorney General Raúl Torrez, imposing the maximum $375 million penalty under consumer protection laws. The case, filed in 2023, accused Meta of knowing its platforms—Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp—exposed children to exploitation, sextortion, self-harm content, grooming, and mental health harms, yet failing to implement adequate safeguards while publicly claiming to prioritize safety. Jurors reviewed internal Meta documents, including teen mental health research and executive emails discussing these issues, as presented by prosecutors, as first reported by Reuters. The ruling came one day after closing arguments in the weeks-long trial. Meta spokesperson Andy Stone stated, “We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal. We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously, and we remain confident in our record of protecting teens online.” Attorney General Torrez hailed the outcome as a “historic victory” for families, saying, “Meta executives knew their products harmed children, disregarded warnings from their own employees, and lied to the public about what they knew. Today the jury joined families, educators, and child safety experts in saying enough is enough.” The state plans to pursue further action, arguing Meta constitutes a “public nuisance” in a bench trial set to begin in May, seeking additional penalties and platform changes. This verdict arrives amid similar scrutiny, including an ongoing Los Angeles jury deliberation in a social media addiction case against Meta where CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Illustration of lawyers in court using AI for fake citations in a Meta Facebook lawsuit case.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Lawyers face sanctions for AI fake citations in Facebook lawsuit

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

A US appeals court has warned that lawyers may face sanctions after submitting an appeal filled with fictitious quotations generated by artificial intelligence. The case involved an attempt to force Meta to remove a critical post from a dating safety group on Facebook.

Juries in California and New Mexico last week held Meta and Alphabet's YouTube liable for harms to young users, awarding a total of over $381 million in damages. The cases targeted platform features rather than third-party content, challenging long-standing Section 230 protections. Company lawyers have vowed to appeal the rulings.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Consumer Federation of America has filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against Meta, accusing the company of failing to protect users from scam advertisements on Facebook and Instagram. The suit, alleging violations of Washington D.C. consumer protection laws, claims Meta has misled users and prioritized profits over safety. It includes examples of scam ads found in Meta's ad library.

PDP leader Iltija Mufti said on Tuesday she is considering legal recourse against Meta after her X and Facebook accounts were withheld without prior notice.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

A San Francisco jury ruled that Elon Musk deceived Twitter shareholders during his chaotic $44 billion buyout of the platform in 2022. Damages are yet to be determined but could amount to several billion dollars. The jury rejected claims of deliberate fraudulent maneuvers.

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ