Prosecutor rules against government's anti-picketing protocol

Prosecutor Rodrigo Cuesta ruled before the Federal Contentious Administrative Chamber to reject the government's appeal and uphold the nullity of the anti-picketing protocol promoted by the Ministry of Security. The opinion emphasizes that the right to protest has preferential protection over absolute traffic priority and criticizes automatic police intervention. The final decision rests with the Chamber.

Prosecutor Rodrigo Cuesta issued an opinion to the Federal Contentious Administrative Chamber recommending dismissal of the national government's appeal against the ruling that declared the anti-picketing protocol null. This measure, promoted by the Ministry of Security under former minister Patricia Bullrich, aimed to regulate protests by prioritizing vehicular traffic over the right to social protest, according to the opinion reported on March 26, 2026, by Perfil and other outlets. Cuesta argued that the state cannot prioritize traffic absolutely, as the right to demonstration enjoys 'preferential protection' in democracy. He stated that the protocol exceeds the ministry's powers by regulating fundamental rights through an administrative norm that nullifies constitutional guarantees. The prosecutor warned against the 'automaticity' of police repression, which mandates immediate intervention for any public road obstruction without assessing circumstances or the legitimacy of the claim, rendering it 'incompatible with the standards of reasonableness and proportionality' required by the Constitution. The case was brought by organizations including CELS, Amnesty International, Sipreba, ATE, ANDHES, Polo Obrero, FOL, and the Neuquén Indigenous Confederation, who denounced the measure's punitive bias. For CELS, the opinion marks significant judicial oversight of public order policies that restrict democratic rights. Though non-binding, it bolsters the plaintiffs' position and complicates the government's defense. The Chamber must now decide whether to confirm the nullity, in a case that could set precedent on balancing circulation and social expression in Argentina.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Lawmakers in Ecuador's Chamber of Deputies applaud the approval of the Municipal Security Law empowering inspectors with tasers, screen shows key powers.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Congress approves municipal security law allowing tasers for inspectors

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

The Chamber of Deputies approved the Municipal Security Law on Tuesday, strengthening municipalities' preventive role and granting new powers to inspectors, such as using tasers and seizing street vending. Security Minister Luis Cordero emphasized that the law sets standards without creating a municipal police. Mayors celebrated the approval as a win for municipalism.

A federal judge annulled the anti-picket protocol, ruling that the Ministry of Security lacks authority to restrict constitutional rights administratively. The national government, led by Security Minister Alejandra Monteoliva, defended the measure and announced it will appeal in the courts. The judicial decision stems from a collective amparo filed by the Center for Legal and Social Studies (CELS).

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The defense of former Interior Minister Andrés Chadwick requested a guarantees hearing in Santiago's Seventh Guarantee Court, claiming obstacles in accessing the investigation file from the Antofagasta Regional Prosecutor's Office. The Public Ministry denied any administrative delays and confirmed document availability since March 2024. They also highlighted prior meetings with lawyers and one scheduled for December 22.

Provincial deputy Santiago Pérez Pons filed a criminal complaint against Mayor Bruno Cipolini and his economic team for irregularities in handling public funds invested in risky stock instruments. The accusation alleges embezzlement and lack of authorization, amid deficit budgets. The municipality defends its actions as legal and plans to recover the lost funds.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

The Colombian government, led by President Gustavo Petro, announced legal actions against 17 governors refusing to apply the economic emergency decree, as the Constitutional Court reviews its legality. This clash creates uncertainty over collected taxes, such as the 19% VAT on liquors, and potential refunds if the measure is ruled unconstitutional. Experts warn that criminal penalties are unlikely and highlight the complexity of reimbursements.

Prosecutors will charge Neiva's ex-mayor Gorky Muñoz Calderón and two former officials with prevarication for illegally expanding the urban perimeter via Decree 1066 of 2023. Issued weeks before his term ended, it was revoked by the current administration. The hearing was suspended and will resume after Easter week.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Santiago's Third Oral Criminal Court acquitted eight defendants in the SQM case by majority, including former senator Pablo Longueira and candidate Marco Enríquez-Ominami, criticizing the process's length and the prosecution's evidence quality. The verdict highlights a violation of the right to a timely trial after 11 years of investigation and a three-year trial. The sentence will be delivered in August 2026, leaving room for a nullity appeal.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ