Prosecutor rules against government's anti-picketing protocol

Prosecutor Rodrigo Cuesta ruled before the Federal Contentious Administrative Chamber to reject the government's appeal and uphold the nullity of the anti-picketing protocol promoted by the Ministry of Security. The opinion emphasizes that the right to protest has preferential protection over absolute traffic priority and criticizes automatic police intervention. The final decision rests with the Chamber.

Prosecutor Rodrigo Cuesta issued an opinion to the Federal Contentious Administrative Chamber recommending dismissal of the national government's appeal against the ruling that declared the anti-picketing protocol null. This measure, promoted by the Ministry of Security under former minister Patricia Bullrich, aimed to regulate protests by prioritizing vehicular traffic over the right to social protest, according to the opinion reported on March 26, 2026, by Perfil and other outlets. Cuesta argued that the state cannot prioritize traffic absolutely, as the right to demonstration enjoys 'preferential protection' in democracy. He stated that the protocol exceeds the ministry's powers by regulating fundamental rights through an administrative norm that nullifies constitutional guarantees. The prosecutor warned against the 'automaticity' of police repression, which mandates immediate intervention for any public road obstruction without assessing circumstances or the legitimacy of the claim, rendering it 'incompatible with the standards of reasonableness and proportionality' required by the Constitution. The case was brought by organizations including CELS, Amnesty International, Sipreba, ATE, ANDHES, Polo Obrero, FOL, and the Neuquén Indigenous Confederation, who denounced the measure's punitive bias. For CELS, the opinion marks significant judicial oversight of public order policies that restrict democratic rights. Though non-binding, it bolsters the plaintiffs' position and complicates the government's defense. The Chamber must now decide whether to confirm the nullity, in a case that could set precedent on balancing circulation and social expression in Argentina.

Relaterade artiklar

Illustration of tensions between Milei government and PRO over a judicial nomination in the Argentine Senate.
Bild genererad av AI

Tensions rise between Milei government and PRO over judicial nomination and Adorni criticism

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The Senate approved María Verónica Michelli's nomination as judge despite executive opposition. The government and PRO leaders exchanged accusations over ethics and transparency.

The full bench of the Santiago Court unanimously rejected the Antofagasta Prosecutor's Office request to lift the immunity of metropolitan governor Claudio Orrego in the ProCultura case. The 50-page ruling sharply criticizes the investigation for confusing administrative faults with criminal offenses. The judges noted the absence of clear evidence to support the charges.

Rapporterad av AI

The IV Chamber of the National Appeals Court in Federal Contencioso Administrativo ordered labor judge Alejandro Ojeda to transfer the labor reform case within 24 hours. The order aims to resolve the jurisdiction dispute and speed up the government's challenge to the CGT's injunction. It marks another setback for the labor union confederation.

The Supreme Tribunal of the Party of the People annulled the April 25 internal elections due to administrative inconsistencies and ordered the process repeated under stricter standards. Lista B, which had won 592 votes to 78, rejected the ruling and announced it will appeal.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation decided to intervene in the case filed by La Pampa against the National State over the distribution of National Treasury Contributions. The highest court gave the government 60 days to respond.

The Tribunal Administrativo de Cundinamarca has backed the Consejo de Estado ruling that suspends transfers of funds from AFP private pension administrators to Colpensiones. The decision drew criticism from President Gustavo Petro and Labor Minister Antonio Sanguino. Colpensiones stated that resources belonging to 129,000 people who switched regimes must be moved to cover pension payments.

Rapporterad av AI

Spain's Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request to suspend the extraordinary regularization process for immigrants. The ruling came after a hearing involving the Madrid regional government, Vox and other groups.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj