Delhi high court: public figures must be ready for brickbats

The Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot prevent people from making fun of public figures unless the remarks are humiliating or disparaging. The bench made these remarks while hearing Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna’s plea seeking protection for his personality rights.

A bench of the Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot stop people from poking fun at public figures unless the comments are disparaging or humiliating. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made the remark while hearing a plea by Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna seeking protection of his personality rights. “You have newspapers, you have cartoonists. They do make caricatures, and they do make fun of people, right? Now, whether that can be taken now?” the bench said. “If you are going to be a public figure, please be ready for brickbats too. People will make fun. We can’t stop that, unless it is disparaging or something that puts your respect down or humiliating.” Google’s counsel submitted that Balakrishna was seeking removal of certain news reports, commentary, and caricatures linked to Supreme Court proceedings against him, without impleading the news organisations or content creators. The counsel called the prayer “very dangerous” and said such suits could not be used for a proxy battle against social media intermediaries. Senior advocate Arvind Nayar, for Balakrishna, clarified that content related to the top court judgment need not be taken down. He noted Balakrishna’s large following in urban and rural areas, where limited digital literacy makes people vulnerable to deepfakes, fabricated videos, or artificial voice-overs. Nayar sought time for instructions on specific content. The court adjourned the matter to Tuesday. In context, the Supreme Court closed contempt proceedings against yoga exponent Ramdev and Balakrishna in August 2024 after their undertakings against misleading Patanjali ads. The 2022 case by Indian Medical Association alleged violations of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954, and Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1954. Separately, Justice Jyoti Singh’s bench allowed Indian cricket team coach Gautam Gambhir to withdraw his interim injunction plea on personality rights, with liberty to refile, posting it to March 25.

相关文章

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
AI 生成的图像

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant warned on Friday against growing attacks on the judiciary by unemployed individuals posing as media and RTI activists. He made the remarks while hearing a plea by advocate Sanjay Dubey. The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and called for probes into fake law degrees.

由 AI 报道

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

由 AI 报道

The Delhi High Court has raised concerns about the Centre's plan to take over several green spaces in Lutyens' Delhi, including the Delhi Gymkhana Club and Jaipur Polo Ground. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna warned that the move could worsen environmental conditions in the capital.

Additional District and Sessions Judge Tabassum Khan received threats on social media after sentencing seven men to life imprisonment in a 2022 lynching case. Police registered an FIR and increased her security in Narmadapuram district.

由 AI 报道

The Delhi High Court has directed Google LLC to pay Rs 30 lakh in damages to sanitaryware brand Hindware for trademark infringement via its AdWords programme.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝