Delhi high court: public figures must be ready for brickbats

The Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot prevent people from making fun of public figures unless the remarks are humiliating or disparaging. The bench made these remarks while hearing Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna’s plea seeking protection for his personality rights.

A bench of the Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot stop people from poking fun at public figures unless the comments are disparaging or humiliating. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela made the remark while hearing a plea by Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna seeking protection of his personality rights. “You have newspapers, you have cartoonists. They do make caricatures, and they do make fun of people, right? Now, whether that can be taken now?” the bench said. “If you are going to be a public figure, please be ready for brickbats too. People will make fun. We can’t stop that, unless it is disparaging or something that puts your respect down or humiliating.” Google’s counsel submitted that Balakrishna was seeking removal of certain news reports, commentary, and caricatures linked to Supreme Court proceedings against him, without impleading the news organisations or content creators. The counsel called the prayer “very dangerous” and said such suits could not be used for a proxy battle against social media intermediaries. Senior advocate Arvind Nayar, for Balakrishna, clarified that content related to the top court judgment need not be taken down. He noted Balakrishna’s large following in urban and rural areas, where limited digital literacy makes people vulnerable to deepfakes, fabricated videos, or artificial voice-overs. Nayar sought time for instructions on specific content. The court adjourned the matter to Tuesday. In context, the Supreme Court closed contempt proceedings against yoga exponent Ramdev and Balakrishna in August 2024 after their undertakings against misleading Patanjali ads. The 2022 case by Indian Medical Association alleged violations of the Drugs and Magic Remedies Act, 1954, and Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1954. Separately, Justice Jyoti Singh’s bench allowed Indian cricket team coach Gautam Gambhir to withdraw his interim injunction plea on personality rights, with liberty to refile, posting it to March 25.

Mga Kaugnay na Artikulo

A realistic illustration showing the Supreme Court of India alongside scenes of religious devotion, highlighting tensions between law and faith.
Larawang ginawa ng AI

Supreme court questions judicial review of religious practices

Iniulat ng AI Larawang ginawa ng AI

The Supreme Court on Thursday expressed concern that frequent judicial intervention in religious matters could undermine India's civilisational identity, where faith remains deeply connected to society.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant warned on Friday against growing attacks on the judiciary by unemployed individuals posing as media and RTI activists. He made the remarks while hearing a plea by advocate Sanjay Dubey. The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and called for probes into fake law degrees.

Iniulat ng AI

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Tuesday reserved its order in the Bhojshala case after hearing arguments over the religious character of the disputed site in Dhar.

Iniulat ng AI

Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav took a jibe on Saturday at Uttar Pradesh deputy chief ministers Brajesh Pathak and Keshav Prasad Maurya over their meeting. In a cryptic post, he remarked that Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath was missing. The deputy CMs hit back, emphasizing their unity and commitment to public service.

Milimani court has acquitted 24-year-old university student David Oaga Mokaya of charges for publishing false information through an AI-generated image depicting a funeral procession linked to President William Ruto. He was arrested in November 2024 amid Gen Z protests. The court dismissed the case due to insufficient evidence.

Iniulat ng AI

Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma recused herself on April 28 from hearing Congress MP Karti Chidambaram's plea to quash a CBI FIR. The FIR relates to allegations of helping an alcoholic beverage company bypass a ban on duty-free whisky sales. The matter will now be listed before another bench on July 21.

 

 

 

Gumagamit ng cookies ang website na ito

Gumagamit kami ng cookies para sa analytics upang mapabuti ang aming site. Basahin ang aming patakaran sa privacy para sa higit pang impormasyon.
Tanggihan