Madras High Court says ChatGPT cannot replace qualified lecturers

The Madras High Court has ruled that AI tools like ChatGPT cannot be equated with qualified teachers. A Division Bench stressed that lessons on integrity and morality must come from classroom settings. The decision came while overturning a single judge's order on student attendance.

A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar made the observations on 18 June 2026. They set aside an order that had allowed three government law college students without the required 65% attendance to write examinations after special summer classes. The Bench allowed writ appeals filed by the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University.

The judges stated that AI may approach human intelligence but cannot teach integrity and morality. They noted such lessons require a vibrant classroom. The ruling added that legal education connects students to legal and human rights and demands collective voices in class.

The Bench observed that online classes offer learning only when needed but cannot substitute physical classrooms permanently. Regular attendance builds self-discipline, punctuality and positive social behaviours, they said. The court emphasised fairness to students who meet attendance rules through merit.

ተያያዥ ጽሁፎች

Illustration of lawyers in court using AI for fake citations in a Meta Facebook lawsuit case.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Lawyers face sanctions for AI fake citations in Facebook lawsuit

በAI የተዘገበ በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

A US appeals court has warned that lawyers may face sanctions after submitting an appeal filled with fictitious quotations generated by artificial intelligence. The case involved an attempt to force Meta to remove a critical post from a dating safety group on Facebook.

The Supreme Court AI Committee has released draft regulations that bar the use of artificial intelligence for determining judicial outcomes or profiling witnesses and parties in court cases.

በAI የተዘገበ

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

በAI የተዘገበ

A new guest column calls on AI researchers to actively apply ethical guidelines amid rapid technological advances.

ይህ ድረ-ገጽ ኩኪዎችን ይጠቀማል

የእኛን ጣቢያ ለማሻሻል ለትንታኔ ኩኪዎችን እንጠቀማለን። የእኛን የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ አንብቡ የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ ለተጨማሪ መረጃ።
ውድቅ አድርግ