Madras High Court says ChatGPT cannot replace qualified lecturers

The Madras High Court has ruled that AI tools like ChatGPT cannot be equated with qualified teachers. A Division Bench stressed that lessons on integrity and morality must come from classroom settings. The decision came while overturning a single judge's order on student attendance.

A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar made the observations on 18 June 2026. They set aside an order that had allowed three government law college students without the required 65% attendance to write examinations after special summer classes. The Bench allowed writ appeals filed by the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University.

The judges stated that AI may approach human intelligence but cannot teach integrity and morality. They noted such lessons require a vibrant classroom. The ruling added that legal education connects students to legal and human rights and demands collective voices in class.

The Bench observed that online classes offer learning only when needed but cannot substitute physical classrooms permanently. Regular attendance builds self-discipline, punctuality and positive social behaviours, they said. The court emphasised fairness to students who meet attendance rules through merit.

Artikel Terkait

Illustration of lawyers in court using AI for fake citations in a Meta Facebook lawsuit case.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Pengacara terancam sanksi akibat kutipan palsu AI dalam gugatan Facebook

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Sebuah pengadilan banding di Amerika Serikat telah memperingatkan bahwa para pengacara mungkin akan menghadapi sanksi setelah mengajukan banding yang berisi kutipan-kutipan fiktif yang dihasilkan oleh kecerdasan buatan. Kasus ini bermula dari upaya untuk memaksa Meta menghapus unggahan kritis dari sebuah grup keamanan kencan di Facebook.

The Supreme Court AI Committee has released draft regulations that bar the use of artificial intelligence for determining judicial outcomes or profiling witnesses and parties in court cases.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Sebuah kolom tamu baru meminta para peneliti AI untuk secara aktif menerapkan pedoman etika di tengah kemajuan teknologi yang pesat.

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak