Madras High Court says ChatGPT cannot replace qualified lecturers

The Madras High Court has ruled that AI tools like ChatGPT cannot be equated with qualified teachers. A Division Bench stressed that lessons on integrity and morality must come from classroom settings. The decision came while overturning a single judge's order on student attendance.

A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and N. Senthilkumar made the observations on 18 June 2026. They set aside an order that had allowed three government law college students without the required 65% attendance to write examinations after special summer classes. The Bench allowed writ appeals filed by the Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University.

The judges stated that AI may approach human intelligence but cannot teach integrity and morality. They noted such lessons require a vibrant classroom. The ruling added that legal education connects students to legal and human rights and demands collective voices in class.

The Bench observed that online classes offer learning only when needed but cannot substitute physical classrooms permanently. Regular attendance builds self-discipline, punctuality and positive social behaviours, they said. The court emphasised fairness to students who meet attendance rules through merit.

Artigos relacionados

Illustration of lawyers in court using AI for fake citations in a Meta Facebook lawsuit case.
Imagem gerada por IA

Advogados enfrentam sanções por citações falsas geradas por IA em processo contra o Facebook

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

Um tribunal de apelações dos EUA alertou que advogados podem enfrentar sanções após apresentarem um recurso repleto de citações fictícias geradas por inteligência artificial. O caso envolveu uma tentativa de forçar a Meta a remover uma publicação crítica de um grupo de segurança em encontros no Facebook.

The Supreme Court AI Committee has released draft regulations that bar the use of artificial intelligence for determining judicial outcomes or profiling witnesses and parties in court cases.

Reportado por IA

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

A nine-judge Supreme Court bench stated on Wednesday that courts cannot hollow out religion in the name of reform and logic may not be the right tool to examine faith and belief systems. The remarks came on the second day of hearing a reference from the 2018 Sabarimala judgment. The Centre disagreed on courts deciding religious practices as superstition.

Reportado por IA

Uma nova coluna de convidado convoca pesquisadores de IA a aplicar ativamente diretrizes éticas em meio aos rápidos avanços tecnológicos.

quinta-feira, 18 de junho de 2026, 22:07h

Delhi High Court reserves verdict on Telegram ban

sexta-feira, 12 de junho de 2026, 00:18h

OAB-TO aciona CNJ após desembargador ameaçar multar advogado por uso de IA

domingo, 07 de junho de 2026, 23:24h

CJI Surya Kant stresses Swadeshi jurisprudence at Oxford lecture

quinta-feira, 04 de junho de 2026, 05:29h

HKUST master programme puts humans at centre of AI revolution

sexta-feira, 15 de maio de 2026, 00:49h

CJI Surya Kant criticizes attacks on judiciary by parasites

segunda-feira, 27 de abril de 2026, 13:51h

Malatsi retira minuta de política de IA após exposição de alucinações de IA

quarta-feira, 22 de abril de 2026, 13:35h

Supreme Court signals case-by-case approach in faith disputes

terça-feira, 07 de abril de 2026, 05:24h

Teachers' association sees homework threatened by AI

segunda-feira, 23 de março de 2026, 13:16h

Delhi high court: public figures must be ready for brickbats

domingo, 22 de março de 2026, 03:30h

Deputados do Congresso espanhol usam IA para preparar discursos

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar