Review shows limited cannabis benefits for chronic pain

A comprehensive review of clinical trials suggests that cannabis products high in THC may provide modest, short-term relief for chronic pain, especially neuropathic types, but with notable side effects. In contrast, CBD-dominant products offer no clear advantages. Researchers call for more long-term studies to assess safety and efficacy.

Chronic pain, which persists for months or years, affects millions worldwide and drives interest in alternative treatments like cannabis. A recent analysis, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, pooled data from 25 placebo-controlled randomized trials involving over 2,300 adults. Led by experts at Oregon Health & Science University, the study evaluated cannabis-based products varying in tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) content.

THC, known for producing a psychoactive high, appeared to drive the limited benefits observed. Products with higher THC-to-CBD ratios yielded small reductions in pain severity and slight improvements in physical functioning, such as daily activities. These effects were most evident in neuropathic pain, characterized by sensations like burning or tingling. For instance, oral THC-only formulations showed modest pain relief, with nabilone demonstrating a moderate impact and dronabinol offering minimal change. Nabiximols, combining THC and CBD, slightly eased pain but did not enhance function.

However, these gains were short-term, as most trials lasted only weeks. Products low in THC, including pure CBD options, failed to demonstrate meaningful pain reduction. On the downside, higher-THC items increased risks of adverse effects, including moderate to large rises in dizziness, sedation, and nausea. The researchers categorized products by THC:CBD ratios—high, comparable, or low—and by form, such as oral pills, mouth sprays, or skin topicals, as well as whether they were synthetic, purified, or plant-extracted.

An editorial from the UCLA Center for Cannabis and Cannabinoids underscores the inconsistency in results and ongoing safety concerns. It emphasizes the need for robust, extended research to inform patients, doctors, and regulators. Until then, cannabis's role in managing chronic pain remains tentative, balancing potential relief against evident risks.

Related Articles

Illustration of Stellenbosch University researchers discovering rare flavoalkaloids in cannabis leaves under microscope.
Image generated by AI

Study finds first evidence of rare flavoalkaloids in cannabis leaves

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Researchers at Stellenbosch University say they have found the first evidence of rare phenolic compounds known as flavoalkaloids in cannabis leaves, after profiling dozens of plant chemicals across three commercially grown strains.

A major review published in The Lancet Psychiatry concludes that medicinal cannabis does not effectively treat anxiety, depression or post-traumatic stress disorder. The analysis of 54 randomized controlled trials over 45 years found limited evidence for other conditions like insomnia and autism. Researchers warn of potential harms including psychosis risk and delayed effective treatments.

Reported by AI

A new study from Washington State University shows that consuming THC leads to false memories and disrupts various everyday memory functions. Participants who used cannabis recalled nonexistent words and struggled with tasks like remembering future actions. The research highlights effects even at moderate doses.

Acting US Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an order on Thursday reclassifying state-authorized medical marijuana to Schedule III, a less strictly regulated category. The move does not legalize cannabis under federal law but offers tax breaks and eases research barriers. It follows a directive from President Donald Trump to expedite the process.

Reported by AI

A new review of clinical trials suggests that psychedelics like psilocybin are effective for treating depression but offer no advantage over traditional antidepressants. Researchers accounted for the challenge of blinding in psychedelic studies, where participants can often tell if they received the drug. The findings indicate similar outcomes when compared to unblinded antidepressant trials.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline