Supreme Court hears case on late-arriving mail ballots

The US Supreme Court will hear arguments on Monday in Watson v. Republican National Committee, a case challenging state laws that count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received shortly after. The Republican National Committee argues that federal law requires states to discard such ballots, a stance that could have invalidated over 750,000 votes in the 2024 election. About half of states, including Texas and Mississippi, currently allow these ballots.

The case, originating from a suit by the Republican National Committee against Mississippi, reached the Supreme Court after the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that late-arriving mail ballots are invalid. Judge Andrew Oldham wrote the opinion, interpreting federal election date laws to mean ballots must be received by Election Day, rather than cast by then. This ruling contrasts with historical practices, such as during the Civil War when many states counted absentee ballots arriving up to 20 days late, according to the Constitutional Accountability Center. Federal statutes governing mail ballots are silent on post-election receipt deadlines and explicitly defer to state decisions, the sources note. On the Amicus podcast, Slate's Dahlia Lithwick described the case as 'an existential challenge to mail-in voting' ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Co-host Mark Joseph Stern highlighted that the laws in question address USPS delays beyond voters' control, affecting states across political lines. The discussion links the litigation to the SAVE Act, pending in the Senate, which proposes restrictions on mail voting including discarding late-arriving ballots. Various versions of the bill face hurdles like the filibuster. Stern suggested the court case serves as an alternative path if legislation stalls, though he predicted the justices might overturn the appeals court due to its perceived flaws. Republicans view such measures as ensuring election integrity, while noting Democrats more often use mail voting. The timing raises stakes for upcoming midterms.

Related Articles

Illustration of lawyers arguing over redistricting maps in a Supreme Court-like courtroom, representing lawsuits in Florida, Utah, Virginia, and Louisiana ahead of 2026 midterms.
Image generated by AI

Redistricting lawsuits mount ahead of the 2026 midterms, with major cases in Florida, Utah, Virginia and Louisiana

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

Legal fights over congressional maps are accelerating in multiple states as both parties maneuver for advantage before the November 2026 elections. A high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case involving Louisiana’s congressional map could have broader implications for how race is considered in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.

The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 23 in Watson v. Republican National Committee, weighing whether states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later. The case challenges a Mississippi law allowing a five-day grace period, with similar rules in over 30 states. Conservative justices expressed concerns over fraud risks, while liberals defended state authority.

Reported by AI

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a 5-4 decision prohibiting Americans from suing the Postal Service in federal court for damages when carriers intentionally destroy or refuse to deliver mail. The ruling, written by Justice Clarence Thomas in the case USPS v. Konan, interprets the Federal Tort Claims Act to cover such intentional acts under terms like 'loss' and 'miscarriage.' This comes amid concerns over mail voting integrity ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Some Republican strategists and local party officials say they want President Donald Trump and the GOP to focus on the economy and cost-of-living concerns ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, warning that renewed attention to 2020 election disputes could distract from issues they believe matter more to swing voters.

Reported by AI

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana—which struck down a second majority-Black congressional district as racial gerrymandering—civil rights advocates in the Deep South have condemned the decision as a threat to Black representation. States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Louisiana are redrawing maps, prompting vows of lawsuits and midterm mobilization.

Reported by AI

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday refused to overturn lower court decisions removing Samuel Ronan from Ohio's Republican primary ballot for the 15th Congressional District. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose had disqualified Ronan, who previously sought the Democratic National Committee chairmanship, citing his admitted intent to run Democrats in Republican primaries. No justices dissented from the decision.

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline