Chhattisgarh assembly passes bill against forced religious conversions

The Chhattisgarh assembly has passed the Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026, imposing severe penalties for conversions through force, inducement or fraud. The bill replaces a 1968 law and provides for life imprisonment in cases of mass conversions. Opposition Congress objected and boycotted proceedings.

Raipur: The Chhattisgarh government tabled the Chhattisgarh Dharm Swatantraya Vidheyak, 2026 (Freedom of Religion Bill, 2026) in the assembly on Thursday, targeting religious conversions through force, inducement, fraud, misrepresentation or marriage, including via digital platforms. Introduced by Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Sharma, who holds the home portfolio, it replaces the 1968 law adopted from Madhya Pradesh, deemed inadequate amid modern changes.  The bill broadly defines 'allurement' to include gifts, jobs or promises of better life, and 'coercion' as threats or social boycott. 'Mass conversion' means two or more persons in one event. Offences are cognisable and non-bailable, excluding reconversions to ancestral religion.  Punishments include 7-10 years imprisonment and ₹5 lakh fine for general cases; 10-20 years and ₹10 lakh for involving minors, women, SC/ST/OBC; 10 years to life and ₹25 lakh for mass conversions; life for repeat offenders. Victims can receive up to ₹10 lakh compensation.  Opposition Congress objected, demanding a select committee. Leader Charan Das Mahant called it a 'violation of privacy' that fosters 'fear around personal faith'. T.S. Singh Deo criticised the mass conversion definition as 'disproportionate'. Deepak Baij warned of vague terms targeting minorities. They boycotted after rejection. MLAs opposed public display of conversion notices.  Sharma accused Congress of vote-bank politics, citing incidents in Bastar's Narayanpur and Kanker districts. 'We don't curb voluntary conversions,' he said. He noted the 1968 law was from Congress-era Madhya Pradesh. Similar laws exist in states like Odisha, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh and others.

Relaterede artikler

Dramatic Lok Sabha session: Women's reservation bill rejected with 298-230 vote; Rahul Gandhi criticizes as Amit Shah rebukes amid protests.
Billede genereret af AI

Lok Sabha rejects women's reservation amendment bill in special session

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI

In the ongoing special parliamentary session, the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill, 2026—for one-third women's reservation tied to delimitation—failed in Lok Sabha on Friday with 298 votes in favour and 230 against, missing the required two-thirds majority of 352 out of 528. This follows the bills' contentious introduction the previous day. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi branded it a 'shameful law,' drawing a sharp rebuke from Home Minister Amit Shah, as BJP vowed nationwide protests.

Congress and Left have ramped up attacks on the Centre's FCRA Amendment Bill, 2026, sparking concerns among Kerala's Christian groups ahead of April 9 assembly elections. Church leaders warned against targeting legitimate organisations. The BJP insists the changes safeguard national security.

Rapporteret af AI

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee criticised the BJP's promise to implement the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) at a rally in Keshiary, Paschim Medinipur district. She stated it would strip people of the right to practise their religion and faith. Banerjee also slammed the Delimitation Bill cleared by the Union Cabinet.

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

Rapporteret af AI

India's Supreme Court has agreed to consider a plea by Sanatani Sangsad highlighting violence in West Bengal after the 2021 state polls. The application seeks a high-level monitoring committee chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the state's law and order machinery. The bench directed the petitioner to implead the CBI as a party.

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis