Communities respond to Trump's cuts in environmental justice funding

After the Trump administration terminated over $1.6 billion in EPA grants for environmental justice projects in early 2025, affected communities across the US have faced setbacks in addressing pollution and health risks. In places like East St. Louis, Illinois, planned air quality monitoring efforts were halted midway, leaving residents without vital data on local hazards. Groups are now seeking alternative funding or pursuing legal action amid tighter resources.

The Village of Sauget in St. Clair County, Illinois, has long been an industrial hub with relaxed environmental regulations, founded in 1926 by Monsanto executives and initially named after the company. Home to 134 residents and surrounded by a metro area of 700,000, it hosts polluters including Veolia Environmental Services, which has operated a hazardous waste incinerator since 1999, burning substances like PFAS amid complaints of foul odors.

A 1990s EPA study found elevated levels of lead, volatile organic compounds, and sulfur dioxide in the area, linked to higher cancer and respiratory risks. Children in nearby East St. Louis experience asthma rates far above the national average. Darnell Tingle of United Congregations of Metro-East (UCM), a coalition of local faith groups, noted that congregants suspect the incinerator contributes to illnesses, given the region's poor air quality.

In 2023, UCM secured a $500,000 Community Change Grant from the Biden-era EPA to install air monitors at six churches and analyze the data. However, in early 2025, the incoming Trump administration, led by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, withdrew the funding for 105 such grants totaling at least $1.6 billion, deeming them "unnecessary." Assisted by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the move also shuttered the Office of Environmental Justice, resulting in broader losses estimated at $37 billion.

Only two monitors were installed before the cutoff, and UCM lacks funds for analysis. A May CDC study in Sauget highlighted insufficient data, unable to link air pollutants definitively to health effects.

Zealan Hoover, a former Biden EPA advisor, praised the grants' direct approach to frontline needs, unlike state-distributed funds. The administration justified the cuts as ending the "green new scam" to prioritize energy production, per a White House fact sheet.

Impacts ripple nationwide: In Pocatello, Idaho, nitrate contamination persists without sewer upgrades; South Bronx flooding risks remain unmitigated; and South Dakota's Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe's $19.9 million plans for bridges, resilience hubs, and solar installations stalled.

Communities grieve the losses, Hoover said, citing disbelief turning to disappointment, as in Kipnuk, Alaska, where terminated flood prevention preceded a deluge. Responses vary: UCM seeks other funds; some litigate against the EPA; Flandreau closed its solar application. Rhonda Conn of Native Sun Community Power Development noted the scramble for scarcer resources, shifting focus to workforce training on lean budgets. "It's very stressful," she added, as competition intensifies for limited grants.

Relaterede artikler

Illustration depicting EPA headquarters amid air pollution haze, symbolizing the agency's halt on monetizing public health benefits in pollution rules.
Billede genereret af AI

EPA stops monetizing key health benefits in analysis of some air pollution rules

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

The Environmental Protection Agency under President Trump has stopped assigning dollar values to certain public-health benefits—such as fewer premature deaths and illnesses—from changes in fine particle (PM2.5) and ozone pollution, citing uncertainty in the economic estimates. Public-health and legal experts say the shift could make it easier for the agency to justify rolling back air pollution protections.

One year into Donald Trump's second term, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has undergone significant changes, including staff reductions and program cuts, prompting resistance from current and former employees. Workers like Montana Krukowski and Missy Haniewicz, who signed a public dissent letter, faced firings but are now appealing through legal channels. Advocacy groups are supporting efforts to preserve scientific integrity and rebuild the agency.

Rapporteret af AI

Four months after an explosion at an oil facility in Roseland, Louisiana, spewed toxic sludge across the majority-Black community, residents remain skeptical about federal and state relief efforts. A $1 billion lawsuit against the operator, Smitty’s Supply, targets violations but may not aid affected families directly. Cleanup lags, health issues persist, and environmental advocates highlight patterns of neglect in underserved areas.

A federal judge in Rhode Island has temporarily halted the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's proposed changes to its $4 billion homelessness programs. The ruling prevents what critics called a disruptive shift that could push thousands back onto the streets during winter. States, cities, and nonprofits argued the overhaul was unlawful and harmful.

Rapporteret af AI

Texas is expanding its petrochemical industry with dozens of new facilities and upgrades, despite warnings from experts about increased air pollution and health risks. The state, already a major emitter of toxic pollutants, plans projects that could release millions of pounds of carcinogens and contribute to ozone and particulate matter problems. Communities in Jefferson and Harris counties, including majority-minority neighborhoods, face heightened dangers from cancer and respiratory illnesses.

The second Trump administration has initiated sweeping reductions in federal science funding, affecting public health, climate research, and space exploration. Elon Musk, serving as a special adviser, led efforts through the Department of Government Efficiency to slash government spending. These moves mark a significant departure from decades of US investment in scientific progress.

Rapporteret af AI

The U.S. Forest Service approved a commercial logging sale in southern Illinois' Shawnee National Forest, using a categorical exclusion to limit public input and bypass full environmental reviews. Local environmentalists, led by activist Sam Stearns, sued the agency, alleging violations of federal law amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to accelerate timber harvests. A federal judge temporarily halted the project, but logging partially proceeded as the case remains pending.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis