Realistic illustration depicting men's cardiovascular disease risk diverging higher than women's from age 35, based on CARDIA study data.
Image generated by AI

Men’s cardiovascular disease risk begins diverging from women’s around age 35, long-term CARDIA study finds

Image generated by AI
Fact checked

Men’s risk of developing cardiovascular disease begins rising faster than women’s starting in the mid-30s, according to an analysis of the long-running CARDIA cohort. Researchers found men reached a 5% cumulative incidence of cardiovascular disease about seven years earlier than women, with coronary heart disease driving most of the gap; traditional risk factors explained only part of the difference.

A decades-long study that followed U.S. adults from young adulthood into midlife found that men’s cardiovascular disease risk begins to pull away from women’s around age 35.

Researchers analyzed data from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study, which enrolled more than 5,100 Black and white participants ages 18 to 30 in the mid-1980s and followed them through 2020. Because participants were healthy at enrollment, investigators said the dataset allowed them to identify when men’s and women’s cardiovascular disease trajectories began to diverge.

According to the analysis, men reached a 5% cumulative incidence of cardiovascular disease—defined to include heart attack, stroke and heart failure—at about age 50.5, compared with about age 57.5 for women, a gap of roughly seven years.

Coronary heart disease accounted for most of the difference. Men reached a 2% cumulative incidence of coronary heart disease more than a decade earlier than women, the researchers reported. By contrast, the analysis found similar timing for stroke between men and women, and differences in heart failure appeared later. The authors noted the cohort was still relatively young at the end of follow-up—participants were under 65—which may limit how much later-life patterns can be detected.

The researchers examined whether conventional risk factors could explain the earlier rise in men, evaluating measures including blood pressure, cholesterol, blood sugar, smoking, diet, physical activity and body weight. They found that these factors, including higher rates of hypertension in men, accounted for part—but not all—of the difference, leaving the authors to call for broader investigation into additional biological and social contributors.

“That timing may seem early, but heart disease develops over decades, with early markers detectable in young adulthood,” said Alexa Freedman, an assistant professor of preventive medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and the study’s senior author.

The authors pointed to the American Heart Association’s PREVENT risk equations—which estimate cardiovascular risk beginning at age 30—as one potential tool for earlier assessment.

The report also highlighted a preventive-care gap among U.S. adults ages 18 to 44: women are more than four times as likely as men to attend routine checkups, largely due to gynecologic and obstetric visits. Encouraging preventive visits among young men could be an opportunity to identify risk earlier, the authors said.

The study was published January 28, 2026, in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

What people are saying

Discussions on X about the CARDIA study emphasize that men's cardiovascular disease risk begins rising faster than women's around age 35, primarily due to coronary heart disease. Medical professionals and health advocates advocate for earlier screening and prevention. Some reactions express skepticism, attributing the risk increase to COVID vaccines or stress from relationships. News outlets share the findings neutrally.

Related Articles

Illustration of heart risk tools failing to detect hidden arterial plaque in a patient, highlighting study findings on screening limitations.
Image generated by AI

Study: Heart-attack risk tools fail to flag nearly half of future patients

Reported by AI Image generated by AI Fact checked

A Mount Sinai–led study finds that commonly used heart-attack risk calculators and symptom-based screening fail to identify nearly half of people who will soon experience a first heart attack. The brief report, published November 21 in JACC: Advances, underscores limitations in current prevention strategies and argues for earlier imaging to detect silent plaque.

A new study from Johns Hopkins Medicine reveals that sex hormones like testosterone and estradiol influence heart disease risk in type 2 diabetes differently for men and women. In men, higher testosterone levels were linked to lower risk, while rising estradiol was associated with higher risk; no such patterns emerged in women. The findings suggest potential for more personalized prevention strategies.

Reported by AI

Katie Wells, founder of Wellness Mama, shares insights from her personalized health risk assessment using AI-driven tools, highlighting how lifestyle factors can significantly influence chronic disease risks. The assessment, powered by data from over 10,000 studies, showed her cancer risk below the population average despite family history. It underscores a shift toward proactive prevention over reactive medicine.

Animals across pets, livestock, wildlife and aquaculture are increasingly affected by chronic illnesses long associated with people. A Risk Analysis paper led by the Agricultural University of Athens outlines an integrated model to monitor and manage these conditions across species.

Reported by AI Fact checked

An analysis of more than 63,000 French adults from the long-running NutriNet-Santé cohort found that plant-based diets built around minimally processed, nutritionally high-quality foods were associated with about a 40% lower risk of cardiovascular disease, while diets heavy in ultra-processed plant products could erase this benefit and were tied to substantially higher risk, according to researchers from INRAE and partner institutions.

A large study indicates that tailoring breast cancer screening to individual risk factors is safer and more effective than routine annual mammograms for all women. Researchers from the WISDOM study analyzed data from 46,000 participants and found reduced rates of advanced cancers without compromising safety. The approach incorporates genetics, health history, and lifestyle to customize screening frequency.

Reported by AI Fact checked

A randomized clinical trial suggests that a year of guideline-level aerobic exercise was associated with small but measurable reductions in an MRI-based estimate of “brain age,” leaving participants’ brains looking close to one year younger than those of a usual-care control group.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline