Special counsel demands death penalty for ex-President Yoon

A special counsel team demanded the death penalty for former President Yoon Suk Yeol during the final hearing of his insurrection trial at the Seoul Central District Court on Tuesday. The request stems from his declaration of martial law on Dec. 3, 2024. The court plans to deliver its ruling on Feb. 19.

The final hearing of former President Yoon Suk Yeol's insurrection trial took place at the Seoul Central District Court on Tuesday. The special counsel team demanded the death penalty, arguing that Yoon declared martial law to seize control of the judiciary and legislature for long-term retention of power. Assistant special counsel Park Eok-su stated, "Former President Yoon declared martial law with the purpose of remaining in power for a long time by seizing the judiciary and legislature. The nature of the crime is serious as he mobilized physical resources that should have been used only in the interest of the national collective."

In his 90-minute final statement, Yoon maintained his innocence, asserting that "It was not a military dictatorship that suppresses citizens, but an effort to safeguard freedom and sovereignty, and revive the constitutional order." He criticized the investigations and indictment as a "frenzied sword dance characterized by purges and repression." During the proceedings, Yoon showed a faint smile from the dock, while some supporters in the gallery cursed loudly.

The trial, over a year after Yoon's martial law declaration on Dec. 3, 2024, to eradicate anti-state forces, involves charges of conspiring with former Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun and others to subvert the Constitution. He allegedly mobilized troops and police to seal off the National Assembly, preventing lawmakers from voting down the decree, and ordered arrests of the Assembly speaker and party leaders. Yoon became the first sitting president indicted with detention in January 2025, was released in March, and recustodied in July on additional charges.

Cheong Wa Dae expects the judiciary to deliver a verdict in accordance with the law and principles, meeting public expectations. The ruling Democratic Party called the demand a "commonsense conclusion," urging no leniency. DP spokesperson Park Soo-hyun said, "It is a declaration that the law will hold those responsible to the most severe accountability for acts that sought to destroy the constitutional order and overturn the people's sovereignty by force."

The special counsel sought life imprisonment for Kim Yong-hyun, 20 years for former National Police Agency chief Cho Ji-ho, 15 years for former Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency chief Kim Bong-sik, and 30 years for retired Army Maj. Gen. Noh Sang-won. South Korea has not executed anyone since December 1997, making it a de facto abolitionist in practice.

Artículos relacionados

Heavy police presence secures Seoul court amid clashing pro- and anti-Yoon rallies before insurrection verdict.
Imagen generada por IA

Tight security in Seoul as Yoon awaits first verdict on 2024 martial law insurrection charges

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

Police have bolstered security around Seoul's Central District Court amid rallies by supporters and critics of former President Yoon Suk Yeol ahead of the first verdict in his insurrection trial on February 19, 2026. Special prosecutors recommended the death penalty for his short-lived 2024 martial law declaration, with the ruling set for 3 p.m.

A special counsel team sought a 10-year prison term for former President Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday over obstruction of justice and other charges tied to his December 2024 martial law declaration. During the final hearing at the Seoul Central District Court, prosecutor Cho Eun-suk's team criticized Yoon for severely undermining South Korea's rule of law. This trial marks the first of four martial law-related cases to conclude.

Reportado por IA

Former President Yoon Suk Yeol will receive his first court verdict this week over obstruction of justice and other charges tied to his short-lived imposition of martial law in December 2024. The Seoul Central District Court has scheduled the sentencing hearing for 2 p.m. Friday and approved live broadcasts due to public interest. This marks the first sentencing among the eight cases he faces.

El Tribunal Superior de Seúl tiene previsto celebrar la audiencia final este lunes a las 14:00 horas para el juicio del expresidente Yoon Suk Yeol por obstrucción a la justicia y otros cargos derivados de su breve imposición de la ley marcial. El procedimiento sigue a las apelaciones presentadas tanto por Yoon como por la fiscal especial Cho Eun-suk contra la sentencia de cinco años de prisión dictada por un tribunal inferior. Yoon fue condenado en enero por cargos que incluyen obstruir a los investigadores y convocar reuniones selectivas del Gabinete.

Reportado por IA

El equipo legal del expresidente Yoon Suk-yeol presentó el lunes una apelación contra la sentencia de cinco años de prisión impuesta por el Tribunal de Distrito Central de Seúl. La sentencia, la primera relacionada con su efímera declaración de ley marcial en diciembre de 2024, incluye cargos por obstruir el intento de detención de los investigadores. El equipo afirma que la decisión es inaceptable y está plagada de errores procesales.

A medida que se acerca el primer aniversario de la declaración de la ley marcial del 3 de diciembre de 2024 por parte del expresidente Yoon Suk Yeol, el presidente Lee Jae Myung planea un discurso especial destacando la restauración de la democracia. El Partido del Poder Popular de la oposición enfrenta un creciente turmoil interno, mientras la policía se disculpa por sus acciones en ese momento. Los analistas dicen que el incidente ha intensificado los conflictos partidistas y las divisiones regionales.

Reportado por IA

El Partido Demócrata gobernante presentó el 22 de diciembre un proyecto de ley para establecer un tribunal especial para casos de insurrección relacionados con el fallido intento del expresidente Yoon Suk Yeol de imponer la ley marcial. La medida busca abordar los retrasos y la injusticia percibida en los juicios en curso, pero enfrenta críticas por posible inconstitucionalidad y por socavar la independencia judicial. La oposición ha jurado lanzar un filibustero para bloquearlo.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar