Bad River Band sues to protect wild rice from Enbridge pipeline

The Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa has filed a lawsuit against the US Army Corps of Engineers to halt construction of a 41-mile addition to Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline. The tribe argues the project threatens wetlands, rivers, and treaty-protected resources essential for wild rice harvesting. Earthjustice, representing the band, claims the federal permit violates environmental laws.

Each August, the Bad River Band harvests wild rice, known as manoomin in Ojibwe, from shallow waters in northern Wisconsin's Great Lakes region. This practice, vital to the tribe's culture and sustenance, now faces risks from Enbridge's plan to reroute its aging Line 5 pipeline around the band's 124,655-acre reservation.

In October, the US Army Corps of Engineers granted Enbridge a permit for the 41-mile extension, which would cross at least 70 waterways using explosives and horizontal drilling. The lawsuit, filed by Earthjustice, contends this permit ignores the National Environmental Policy Act and Clean Water Act. It highlights how leaks could contaminate the watershed flowing into the reservation, endangering rice beds and fishing grounds. "For hundreds of years, and to this day, the Band’s ancestors and members have lived, hunted, fished, trapped, gathered, and engaged in traditional activities in the wetlands and waters to be crossed by the project," the complaint states.

Line 5, operational for over 70 years, originally crossed the reservation in the 1950s without tribal consultation, despite treaties from 1842 and 1854 guaranteeing hunting, gathering, and fishing rights. Enbridge's history includes major spills: over a million gallons into Michigan's Kalamazoo River in 2010, and 69,000 gallons in southern Wisconsin last year—initially underreported as two gallons.

The band's legal fight builds on prior victories. In 2019, they sued to end pipeline operations on reservation land; a 2023 federal ruling ordered removal within three years and a $5.1 million fine for trespassing. Under the Biden administration, the Corps opted for a quicker environmental assessment over a full impact study, limiting tribal input.

Gussie Lord, an Earthjustice attorney from the Oneida Nation, described the push for fossil fuels as a "backward-looking playbook." She noted the uphill battle but emphasized the band's duty to safeguard the environment for future generations: "We need people who are going to be thinking about what makes sense, for the future, not just 10 years from now, but 50 years, 100 years from now."

Enbridge plans to intervene, stating the permit remains unsigned and not yet final. The band has also sued Wisconsin's Department of Natural Resources over state approvals. Similar disputes rage in Michigan, where tribal nations challenge a Line 5 segment under the Straits of Mackinac.

Articoli correlati

Indigenous protesters occupy Cargill headquarters in Santarém, Brazil, continuing demonstration against Tapajós River dredging plans.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Gruppi indigeni mantengono protesta contro dragaggio fiume Tapajós

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

I gruppi indigeni che occupano la sede di Cargill a Santarém, Pará, hanno deciso di continuare la protesta indefinita contro il piano di dragaggio del fiume Tapajós, sostenendo che il governo ha abbandonato le negoziazioni. Nonostante ciò, il governo federale ha annunciato la sospensione della gara d'appalto per l'assunzione dell'azienda responsabile dei lavori. L'azione, durata 16 giorni, chiede la revoca di un decreto che include la via navigabile in un programma di privatizzazione.

The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a narrow procedural question in a dispute over the Line 5 oil pipeline, which could decide whether Michigan state courts or federal courts handle the case. The pipeline crosses the ecologically sensitive Straits of Mackinac, sacred to Anishinaabe peoples and protected by treaty rights for several tribal nations. Michigan officials seek to shut it down due to spill risks, while Enbridge argues for its continued operation.

Riportato dall'IA

The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on whether the controversial Line 5 pipeline case belongs in state or federal court. Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel seeks to shut down the pipeline due to risks to the Great Lakes, while Enbridge Energy argues for federal oversight. The procedural dispute could affect the pipeline's operation across the Straits of Mackinac.

The U.S. House failed to override President Donald Trump's December veto of a bipartisan bill transferring 30 acres of Florida Everglades land to the Miccosukee Tribe. Trump cited the tribe's opposition to a nearby immigration detention center. The decision stalls tribal efforts to restore the area and protect against climate-driven flooding.

Riportato dall'IA

Negotiations among seven U.S. states over Colorado River water allocations have stalled, missing key deadlines as reservoirs hit record lows after the driest winter in decades. The Trump administration may impose unilateral cuts if no agreement is reached by September, potentially disrupting economies in Arizona and beyond. Tensions persist between Upper and Lower Basin states over sharing reductions in the river's shrinking flow.

The U.S. Forest Service approved a commercial logging sale in southern Illinois' Shawnee National Forest, using a categorical exclusion to limit public input and bypass full environmental reviews. Local environmentalists, led by activist Sam Stearns, sued the agency, alleging violations of federal law amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to accelerate timber harvests. A federal judge temporarily halted the project, but logging partially proceeded as the case remains pending.

Riportato dall'IA

Oil companies including ConocoPhillips, Shell and Exxon Mobil spent more than $164 million on leases covering 1.3 million acres in Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve near Nuiqsut, despite a court injunction aimed at protecting Teshekpuk Lake. The Trump administration voided a prior agreement safeguarding the area for wildlife and Iñupiat communities. Local leaders expressed concerns over health, culture and subsistence impacts.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta