Millions of Americans faced uncertainty on November 1 as the government shutdown collided with court orders directing the administration to keep SNAP running. Food bank leaders say they cannot substitute for the federal program, and payment delays are still likely as states work to reload benefits.
A month into the federal shutdown, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — which serves roughly 1 in 8 U.S. residents — was thrust into limbo as November began. On Friday, federal judges in Rhode Island and Massachusetts ordered the administration to use reserve funds to continue paying SNAP, even as officials warned it could take time for states to distribute money. (reuters.com)
U.S. District Judge John J. McConnell Jr. in Providence ruled from the bench that the program must tap contingency reserves and requested an update by Monday, Nov. 3. In Boston, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani called the planned suspension “unlawful” and gave the administration the same Monday deadline to explain whether it would partially or fully fund November benefits. The orders were parallel, not conflicting. (bostonglobe.com)
The White House has argued it lacks legal authority to extend aid with emergency reserves during the shutdown — a departure from guidance used during the 2018–2019 closure — but the courts rejected that position. President Trump said he asked government lawyers to seek clarity from the courts and acknowledged that benefits could be delayed as states “get the money out.” (washingtonpost.com)
A coalition of Democratic attorneys general and several governors sued to block the suspension, saying benefits cannot lawfully be cut off. Rhode Island’s attorney general detailed a multistate complaint, citing available federal contingency funds to maintain payments. (riag.ri.gov)
SNAP serves about 41.7 million people nationwide — roughly 12% of the population — and typically costs close to $9 billion per month, more than the balance in the program’s contingency fund. That gap is one reason states have warned of staggered or reduced disbursements if shutdown-era funding continues. (ers.usda.gov)
Food bank officials say they are unprepared to replace a nationwide entitlement. “This is a huge increase in need, but that’s where comparisons end… there will not be SNAP,” said Jason Riggs of Roadrunner Food Bank of New Mexico, which serves a state where about 21% of residents receive SNAP — the nation’s highest share. Sari Vatske, CEO of Central Texas Food Bank, said shutdowns strain all regions at once: “With this government shutdown, we are all experiencing the same need.” (news.wfsu.org)
Anti-hunger groups note SNAP’s scale dwarfs charitable aid: for every meal distributed by the Feeding America network, SNAP accounts for about nine. That ratio underscores why a large lapse or delay in benefits would quickly overwhelm food banks. (feedingamericaaction.org)
On Capitol Hill, the Senate adjourned for the weekend on Thursday, Oct. 30, without a shutdown deal, and is slated to reconvene Monday afternoon. In a tense floor exchange the previous day, Senate Majority Leader John Thune criticized Democrats for blocking funding measures: “This isn’t a political game… These are real people’s lives.” (cbsnews.com)
The impasse overlaps with the start of Affordable Care Act open enrollment on Nov. 1. Democrats have been pushing to extend enhanced ACA subsidies that expire at year’s end; Republicans insist on reopening the government before negotiating broader health policy. (reuters.com)
At a Maryland town hall on Oct. 31, one attendee captured the grassroots mood on the left. “I think they should hold out as long as possible,” said Christina Thompson, urging Democrats to maintain leverage in negotiations despite the immediate strain of the shutdown. (vpm.org)
