Supreme Court dismisses Gachagua’s bid to block impeachment case

Kenya’s Supreme Court has dismissed former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s application to halt his impeachment proceedings in the High Court. The unanimous ruling came from a five-judge bench. This allows the case to proceed without interference.

Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua suffered a setback in his impeachment battle when Kenya’s Supreme Court dismissed his application to pause proceedings in the High Court. The ruling, delivered on January 30, 2026, came unanimously from a five-judge bench led by Chief Justice Martha Koome, alongside Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu and Justices Smokin Wanjala, Njoki Ndung’u, and Isaac Lenaola.

The apex court clarified that it can only grant stay orders for proceedings in the Court of Appeal, not the High Court. “The first omnibus application by Hon. Gachagua is dismissed for the reasons that the Supreme Court can only stay proceedings before the Court of Appeal and not the High Court as prayed for,” the court stated.

Gachagua’s first application sought to halt High Court proceedings, strike out an appeal, and expunge certain documents. The second, filed by the National Assembly, aimed to dismiss Gachagua’s cross-appeal.

Earlier petitions in the High Court had challenged the Deputy Chief Justice’s authority to select the judges and sought their disqualification over alleged bias. The High Court rejected these, ruling that the Deputy Chief Justice acted within her administrative powers and no evidence supported disqualification.

The Court of Appeal later held that selecting High Court benches is the Chief Justice’s exclusive prerogative and generally not delegable. It upheld the High Court’s decision on disqualification, finding the evidence insufficient.

The Supreme Court dismissed both applications, noting the documents in question were essential to the appeal and cross-appeal. “The documents sought to be expunged are integral to the determination of the appeal before the Supreme Court and were referred to by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal in their determination of the dispute,” the court affirmed.

“The second application by the National Assembly is dismissed for the reason that the cross appeal by Gachagua equally does not fall within the parameters of summary dismissal,” it added.

This paves the way for Gachagua’s impeachment case to continue unimpeded by the Supreme Court.

관련 기사

A dramatic courtroom scene from the Constitutional Court hearing on President Ramaphosa's impeachment over Phala Phala.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Constitutional court orders impeachment committee for Ramaphosa over Phala Phala

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

South Africa's Constitutional Court has ruled that Parliament acted unconstitutionally by blocking an impeachment inquiry into President Cyril Ramaphosa in 2022. The decision requires the National Assembly to establish an impeachment committee to examine the Phala Phala matter. Opposition parties immediately called for the president's resignation.

The High Court has ruled on the impeachment case of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. The decision by a three-judge panel is expected to carry major political implications ahead of the 2027 elections.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Former Kenyan Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has withdrawn allegations of bias against three High Court judges. The step, outlined in a May 4, 2026 notice, redirects efforts to the main case challenging his removal from office.

사라 두테르테 부통령 측근들이 하원에서 진행 중인 탄핵 절차를 막기 위해 대법원에 청원을 제기하자 의원들이 반발하고 나섰다. 이번 움직임은 하원 사법위원회가 두 건의 탄핵 심판 청구안에 대한 청문회 절차를 진행한 뒤 나왔다.

AI에 의해 보고됨

대법원이 사라 두테르테 부통령이 제기한 탄핵 심판 중지 가처분 신청을 기각했다. 대법원은 관련 청원들을 병합하여 하원 사법위원회에 10일 이내에 의견서를 제출할 것을 명령했으며, 가처분 결정 없이 4월 14일 청문회가 진행될 예정이다.

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부