Supreme Court dismisses Gachagua’s bid to block impeachment case

Kenya’s Supreme Court has dismissed former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua’s application to halt his impeachment proceedings in the High Court. The unanimous ruling came from a five-judge bench. This allows the case to proceed without interference.

Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua suffered a setback in his impeachment battle when Kenya’s Supreme Court dismissed his application to pause proceedings in the High Court. The ruling, delivered on January 30, 2026, came unanimously from a five-judge bench led by Chief Justice Martha Koome, alongside Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu and Justices Smokin Wanjala, Njoki Ndung’u, and Isaac Lenaola.

The apex court clarified that it can only grant stay orders for proceedings in the Court of Appeal, not the High Court. “The first omnibus application by Hon. Gachagua is dismissed for the reasons that the Supreme Court can only stay proceedings before the Court of Appeal and not the High Court as prayed for,” the court stated.

Gachagua’s first application sought to halt High Court proceedings, strike out an appeal, and expunge certain documents. The second, filed by the National Assembly, aimed to dismiss Gachagua’s cross-appeal.

Earlier petitions in the High Court had challenged the Deputy Chief Justice’s authority to select the judges and sought their disqualification over alleged bias. The High Court rejected these, ruling that the Deputy Chief Justice acted within her administrative powers and no evidence supported disqualification.

The Court of Appeal later held that selecting High Court benches is the Chief Justice’s exclusive prerogative and generally not delegable. It upheld the High Court’s decision on disqualification, finding the evidence insufficient.

The Supreme Court dismissed both applications, noting the documents in question were essential to the appeal and cross-appeal. “The documents sought to be expunged are integral to the determination of the appeal before the Supreme Court and were referred to by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal in their determination of the dispute,” the court affirmed.

“The second application by the National Assembly is dismissed for the reason that the cross appeal by Gachagua equally does not fall within the parameters of summary dismissal,” it added.

This paves the way for Gachagua’s impeachment case to continue unimpeded by the Supreme Court.

相关文章

Illustration of Philippine Supreme Court ruling Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment unconstitutional, courtroom scene with justices, defendant, and documents.
AI 生成的图像

最高法院裁定萨拉·杜特尔特弹劾违宪

由 AI 报道 AI 生成的图像

最高法院裁定2025年针对副总统萨拉·杜特尔特的弹劾案因程序瑕疵而违宪。这一裁决并未证明她无罪,但暂时阻断了程序。进步团体已提交新的弹劾投诉。

The year 2025 witnessed a major constitutional crisis in Kenya's legal sector, with Chief Justice Martha Koome and other High Court judges facing disciplinary complaints from lawyers Nelson Havi, Ahmednasir Abdullahi, and Raphael Tuju. These complaints have triggered investigations and potential removal proceedings. The dispute highlights tensions between judicial independence and accountability.

由 AI 报道

The Director of Public Prosecutions, Renson Ingonga, has asked the Court of Appeal to allow the Anglo Leasing criminal case to proceed without delay. This follows an attempt by two accused individuals to halt their trial after the High Court ruled that they have a case to answer. The case involves allegations of defrauding the government of Ksh6 billion through a 2003 police equipment modernisation contract.

The Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the admissibility of the constitutional accusation against suspended Supreme Court Justice Diego Simpértegui, with 132 votes in favor. The libel, pushed by ruling-party deputies, is based on three chapters regarding breaches of probity in key judicial cases. The Senate will now decide the case on December 22, potentially removing him from office if approved by a majority.

由 AI 报道

Repeated attacks on former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, allegedly involving rogue police and thugs, have sparked major concerns about politics and ethics in Kenya. These incidents, ongoing for over a year, raise eight key questions about motives and implications.

Following last week's impeachment proceedings against Governor Siminalayi Fubara, the Rivers State House of Assembly has accused unnamed individuals of seeking ex parte orders from courts outside Port Harcourt to block its legislative functions. Fubara has called for calm amid the escalating tensions.

由 AI 报道

David Ndii, chairperson of the Presidential Council of Economic Advisors, has downplayed a High Court ruling declaring the offices of President William Ruto's advisors unconstitutional. He described the decision as a pyrrhic victory, insisting that advisors can continue offering guidance informally without state offices. The court nullified the appointments of 21 individuals and all related decisions.

 

 

 

此网站使用 cookie

我们使用 cookie 进行分析以改进我们的网站。阅读我们的 隐私政策 以获取更多信息。
拒绝