Supreme Court finds no impeachment grounds against Marcos over 2024 budget

The Supreme Court did not rule the entire 2024 General Appropriations Act (GAA) unconstitutional or declare impeachment grounds against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Instead, it struck down a special provision on PhilHealth funds and upheld Marcos' certification of urgency. However, in his separate opinion, Justice Marvic Leonen argued that Marcos committed grave abuse of discretion.

In December 2024, the Supreme Court issued a decision in the case concerning the transfer of PhilHealth funds to the National Treasury. In a unanimous ruling penned by Associate Justice Amy Lazaro Javier, it struck down Special Provision 1(d) of the 2024 GAA, which authorized the return of excess reserve funds from government-owned corporations. The court ordered the return of P60 billion in already transferred funds to PhilHealth and permanently enjoined the transfer of the remaining P29.9 billion.

The decision arose from petitions by various groups and public health advocates challenging the Department of Finance's order to transfer P89.9 billion in 'excess' PhilHealth funds. Additionally, the court upheld the validity of President Marcos' certification of the 2024 GAA as urgent, stating that the president acted within his authority.

However, Senior Associate Justice Marvic Leonen dissented in his separate opinion. He argued that Marcos committed 'grave abuse of discretion' by issuing the certification of urgency, as no public calamity or emergency existed at the time. Leonen further contended that the entire 2024 GAA was unconstitutional due to this invalid certification. Yet, this remained the view of a single justice and was not adopted by the full court.

Leonen's statements did not explicitly constitute grounds for impeachment. A misleading YouTube video uploaded on December 6, 2024, with over 22,000 views, misrepresented his opinion as the court's official ruling, fueling misinformation about impeachment against Marcos. To date, no impeachment complaint against the president has succeeded.

Petitioners hailed the decision as a win for every Filipino, amid ongoing scrutiny of budget controversies such as bicameral insertions.

Artigos relacionados

Supreme Court building with VP Sara Duterte and lawyers celebrating impeachment dismissal ruling.
Imagem gerada por IA

Supreme Court upholds dismissal of VP Sara's first impeachment

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

The Supreme Court has ruled that Vice President Sara Duterte's first impeachment case is unconstitutional due to violations of the one-year bar rule and due process. It clarified that new complaints can now be filed immediately. Duterte's lawyers are prepared for potential future proceedings.

Executive Secretary Ralph Recto and former PhilHealth CEO Emmanuel Ledesma Jr. face complaints of technical malversation, graft, plunder, and grave misconduct filed with the Ombudsman over the transfer of P60 billion in 'excess' PhilHealth funds to the national treasury in 2024.

Reportado por IA

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

Rumors are growing of potential impeachment proceedings against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. or Vice President Sara Duterte, but such complaints face significant hurdles due to legal constraints and political realities. Officials say there are no grounds for impeaching Marcos, and the Supreme Court's recent ruling has altered the process.

Reportado por IA

The supreme court has ruled that the 2025 impeachment against vice president sara duterte was unconstitutional due to procedural flaws. This decision does not clear her of wrongdoing but blocks the process for now. New complaints have already been filed by progressive groups.

A viral YouTube video falsely claims that Senator Rodante Marcoleta resigned from his post after voting against the 2026 national budget. In reality, Marcoleta remains a senator, and the video discusses only his opposition to the budget. The claim appears to be misleading clickbait.

Reportado por IA

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. signed the P6.793-trillion national budget for 2026 on January 5, allocating a record P1.015 trillion to the Department of Education and P530.9 billion to the DPWH. He vetoed P92.5 billion in unprogrammed appropriations, leaving P150.9 billion, while vowing prudent spending to curb corruption. The budget bars political involvement in aid distribution, though critics question the remaining funds.

domingo, 08 de fevereiro de 2026, 13:46h

House resumes hearing on Marcos impeachment complaints today

sexta-feira, 06 de fevereiro de 2026, 13:17h

Supreme Court declares Sara Duterte's impeachment unconstitutional

quarta-feira, 04 de fevereiro de 2026, 11:13h

House committee dismisses impeachment complaints against Marcos

segunda-feira, 26 de janeiro de 2026, 04:39h

Opposition refiles second impeachment case against President Marcos

quarta-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2026, 15:08h

Second impeachment complaint against Marcos stalled at House

quarta-feira, 07 de janeiro de 2026, 04:19h

Marcos vetoes P43.24 billion personnel services funding in 2026 budget

domingo, 04 de janeiro de 2026, 10:37h

Marcos signs P6.793-trillion budget for 2026

quinta-feira, 01 de janeiro de 2026, 00:16h

Sen. Imee Marcos refuses to sign 2026 GAA over 'pork giniling' insertions

segunda-feira, 29 de dezembro de 2025, 12:29h

Palace begins review of 2026 national budget

sexta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2025, 17:39h

Gatchalian confident in Marcos' approval of 2026 budget

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar