Chamber approves constitutional accusation against Simpértegui

The Chamber of Deputies unanimously approved the admissibility of the constitutional accusation against suspended Supreme Court Justice Diego Simpértegui, with 132 votes in favor. The libel, pushed by ruling-party deputies, is based on three chapters regarding breaches of probity in key judicial cases. The Senate will now decide the case on December 22, potentially removing him from office if approved by a majority.

In a historic session on December 15, 2025, the Chamber of Deputies unanimously rejected the preliminary issue raised by Diego Simpértegui's defense, with 110 votes against and zero in favor. This paved the way to discuss the merits of the constitutional accusation, which was approved with 132 votes in favor and none against.

The libel, presented by Socialist Party deputies Daniel Manouchehri and Daniella Cicardini, accuses the judge of serious neglect of duties in three areas: failure of probity, abstention, and impartiality in the Codelco vs. Belaz Movitec litigation; conflicts of interest in notarial appointments; and similar breaches in the Fundamenta case. The case is framed within the 'Belarusian plot,' where Simpértegui took a cruise with lawyers Eduardo Lagos and Mario Vargas—currently in preventive prison—days after the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Belaz Movitec.

Defense attorney Felipe Lizama alleged formal flaws, such as insufficient review time and alleged prejudgments by deputies, comparing the case to the failed sale of Salvador Allende's house. However, Deputy Maite Orsini, head of the reviewing commission, defended the process: “The preliminary issue is not a judgment on guilt... Rejecting it only opens the debate that the Constitution requires us to open”.

Manouchehri emphasized: “We are facing a Supreme Court judge who ruled in favor of a party represented by his friends... and with whom he took a cruise afterward”. Lizama insisted that Simpértegui personally covered his expenses and that the Senate will have the final say.

The Chamber appointed Carolina Tello (FA), Daniel Manouchehri (PS), and Jorge Rathgeb (RN) to argue the accusation before the Senate, which will sit as a jury on December 22. If approved with at least 26 votes, Simpértegui would be removed from office and barred from public positions for five years.

Ohun tí àwọn ènìyàn ń sọ

Discussions on X celebrate the Chamber of Deputies' unanimous 132-0 approval of the constitutional accusation against suspended Supreme Court Justice Diego Simpértegui for probity breaches in key cases like the Muñeca Bielorrusa. Deputies across parties stress judicial integrity and conflicts of interest, viewing it as a step toward accountability ahead of the Senate's December 22 decision. No significant opposition or skepticism noted in recent high-engagement posts.

Awọn iroyin ti o ni ibatan

Realistic courtroom scene illustrating judicial defense, suspension, and political payment claims in Chile's Belarusian plot scandal involving key figures and company dispute.
Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Belarusian plot developments involve judicial defense and suspension

Ti AI ṣe iroyin Àwòrán tí AI ṣe

Supreme Court minister Diego Simpertigue defended his role in rulings linked to the Belarusian plot, as judicial fiscal suspended conservador Sergio Yáber for alleged ties. Deputy Cristián Araya faces claims of receiving payments, affecting José Antonio Kast's campaign. These developments highlight irregularities in a dispute between Consorcio Belaz Movitec and Codelco.

The review commission of the Chamber of Deputies unusually annulled the unanimous vote approving the constitutional accusation against Supreme Court Judge Diego Simpértegui due to an error in delivering key documents. Commission President Maite Orsini decided to repeat the vote on Thursday after confirming that a crucial piece of evidence arrived on time but was not reported. This postpones the plenary session until next Monday.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Chile's Supreme Court will elect its new president on Monday amid internal divisions and scandals like the Audio case and the Belarusian plot, which have eroded public trust in the judiciary. Tradition favors Gloria Ana Chevesich, but a group is pushing for María Angélica Repetto to break that practice. The election coincides with the vote on a constitutional accusation against Minister Diego Simpertegui.

The Supreme Court of the Philippines has ruled the impeachment complaint against Vice President Sara Duterte unconstitutional due to timing issues. Associate Justice Marvic Leonen authored the decision, igniting debates over the court's role in impeachment proceedings. Critics contend this intervention shields Duterte from accountability.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

Deputy Felipe Camaño, vice president of the Chamber of Deputies, filed a lawsuit for libel and slander against Franco Parisi and Javier Olivares of the PDG. The action follows criticism over his vote for Jorge Alessandri in last week's Chamber presidency election. Camaño describes his choice as honoring an administrative agreement.

The House justice committee ruled on Monday that two impeachment complaints against President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. were sufficient in form. On Tuesday, February 3, 2026, the panel will assess if they hold sufficient substance. If approved, the process will advance to notify Marcos.

Ti AI ṣe iroyin

San Juan City Rep. Bel Zamora believes the House committee on justice has a solid case for impeaching Vice President Sara Duterte and can secure enough votes for a Senate trial. She said they need around 106 votes, or one-third, and they have the numbers. Duterte's camp has filed a Supreme Court petition to halt the proceedings.

 

 

 

Ojú-ìwé yìí nlo kuki

A nlo kuki fun itupalẹ lati mu ilọsiwaju wa. Ka ìlànà àṣírí wa fun alaye siwaju sii.
Kọ