Illustration depicting a federal judge issuing a temporary block on a Louisiana law abolishing New Orleans' criminal court clerk position, with an appeals court stay overlay.
Illustration depicting a federal judge issuing a temporary block on a Louisiana law abolishing New Orleans' criminal court clerk position, with an appeals court stay overlay.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Federal judge briefly blocks Louisiana law abolishing New Orleans’ elected criminal court clerk position; appeals court stays order

በ AI የተሰራ ምስል
እውነት ተፈትሸ

A federal judge in Baton Rouge issued a temporary restraining order late Sunday blocking Louisiana from enforcing a new law that would abolish the elected Orleans Parish clerk of Criminal District Court and merge its duties into the civil clerk’s office, a change that would prevent clerk-elect Calvin Duncan from taking office. By Monday morning, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit had granted the state an emergency stay, allowing the law to take effect while the legal fight continues.

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry has signed into law legislation that eliminates the standalone elected office of clerk of Orleans Parish Criminal District Court and consolidates its responsibilities into the clerk of the parish’s Civil District Court.

The measure, known as Act 15 (Senate Bill 256), was signed on April 30, 2026—four days before Calvin Duncan, the clerk-elect, was scheduled to be inaugurated, according to the Center for Constitutional Rights and the Associated Press. (ccrjustice.org)

Duncan, a longtime criminal justice advocate, won the November 2025 election for the criminal court clerk’s post with about 68% of the vote, beating incumbent Darren Lombard, the Associated Press reported. (apnews.com)

Duncan’s background has drawn national attention. Records in the National Registry of Exonerations show that an Orleans Parish Criminal District Court judge vacated his murder conviction on August 3, 2021. (exonerationregistry.org) Other profiles and local reporting describe him as having spent roughly 28 years imprisoned before his release in 2011. (law.berkeley.edu)

On Sunday, U.S. District Judge John deGravelles of the Middle District of Louisiana granted Duncan’s request in part for emergency relief, temporarily blocking state officials from enforcing Act 15. A local report on WWL said the judge found the law likely violated due-process and voting rights protections and emphasized that the Louisiana Constitution requires the criminal clerk to be elected. (audacy.com) A press release from the Center for Constitutional Rights similarly said the court declared Act 15 unconstitutional and enjoined the governor and other officials from implementing the consolidation. (ccrjustice.org)

The restraining order allowed Duncan to report for work Monday morning, but the legal status of the office shifted again within hours. The Associated Press reported that the 5th Circuit granted the state’s request to freeze the federal judge’s order around mid-morning Monday, creating immediate uncertainty about who could exercise the clerk’s duties and whether the consolidation could proceed. (apnews.com) Additional local reporting also described the rapid back-and-forth in federal court. (lailluminator.com)

Supporters of the consolidation have argued it would make Orleans Parish align with other parishes by combining court-clerk functions and improving efficiency. (apnews.com) Duncan and allied voting-rights and civil-rights groups have described the law as an attempt to nullify the outcome of a local election in a majority-Black parish and to undermine a reform-minded elected official. (apnews.com)

The dispute over the clerk’s office has unfolded amid a broader set of state-level proposals affecting New Orleans courts. For example, Louisiana Illuminator has reported that separate bills debated this session would reduce the number of judges in Orleans Parish criminal and juvenile courts and alter appellate-court seats—measures supporters tie to restructuring and critics link to politics and local control. (lailluminator.com)

ሰዎች ምን እያሉ ነው

X discussions show strong support from civil rights advocates and pro-democracy accounts for the federal judge's block on Louisiana's law, viewing it as upholding voter will for exoneree Calvin Duncan and blocking unconstitutional interference. Governor Jeff Landry defended the law for court efficiency, criticized media misreporting, and noted the appeals court's stay allowing implementation. Reporters highlighted the ongoing legal battle preventing Duncan from taking office.

ተያያዥ ጽሁፎች

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs executive order postponing U.S. House primaries after Supreme Court strikes down congressional map.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Louisiana Gov. Landry postpones House primaries after Supreme Court Callais ruling on congressional map

በAI የተዘገበ በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

በAI የተዘገበ

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday allowing its April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais to take immediate effect, bypassing the usual 32-day waiting period. This enables Louisiana to cancel its congressional primaries and redraw maps before the 2026 midterms. The move sparked a sharp exchange between Justice Samuel Alito's concurrence and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

በAI የተዘገበ እውነት ተፈትሸ

Legal fights over congressional maps are accelerating in multiple states as both parties maneuver for advantage before the November 2026 elections. A high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case involving Louisiana’s congressional map could have broader implications for how race is considered in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a sharp dissent on Monday as the court declined to hear the case of James Skinner, serving life without parole for the 1998 killing of teenager Eric Walber in Louisiana. Joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sotomayor accused the court of failing to enforce its own precedents on withheld evidence. She highlighted the unequal treatment compared to Skinner's co-defendant Michael Wearry, who was released after similar Brady violations.

በAI የተዘገበ እውነት ተፈትሸ

A federal judge in Fort Worth declared a mistrial Tuesday during jury selection in the case against nine defendants charged in connection with a July 4, 2025, attack outside the Prairieland Detention Center in Alvarado, Texas, after raising concerns that a defense attorney’s clothing could be seen as political messaging to prospective jurors.

ይህ ድረ-ገጽ ኩኪዎችን ይጠቀማል

የእኛን ጣቢያ ለማሻሻል ለትንታኔ ኩኪዎችን እንጠቀማለን። የእኛን የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ አንብቡ የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ ለተጨማሪ መረጃ።
ውድቅ አድርግ