Supreme Court dismisses lawyer’s appeal against contempt action for HC judge remarks

The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed advocate Nilesh Ojha’s appeal challenging contempt proceedings by the Bombay High Court for his remarks against a sitting judge in the Disha Salian death case. The bench observed that holding a press conference to voice such allegations is unbecoming of a lawyer.

The Supreme Court dismissed advocate Nilesh Ojha’s appeal, ruling that holding a press conference in the Disha Salian death case to level allegations against a Bombay High Court judge cannot be taken lightly. Disha Salian, former manager of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, was found dead in June 2020. Ojha, who represented her father Dinesh Salian, made the remarks on April 1, 2025, ahead of a plea for a CBI probe into her death.

The judge wrote to the Bombay High Court Chief Justice, prompting a show-cause notice to Ojha. His reply contained further “disparaging and scandalous imputations,” leading the high court to initiate criminal contempt proceedings. Ojha then approached the Supreme Court challenging this decision.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta stated, “the manner in which the press conference was convened and the allegations were projected is, prima facie, unbecoming of a member of the legal profession.” Justice Mehta added, “An advocate bears a heightened duty to uphold the dignity of the institution… Public confidence in the judiciary constitutes an indispensable foundation of the rule of law.”

The bench noted that the allegations went beyond errors of law or fact, imputing motives and lack of impartiality to a sitting judge, which erodes trust in judicial administration.

ተያያዥ ጽሁፎች

Illustration of Supreme Court justices hearing the Twisha Sharma case.
በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognizance of Twisha Sharma case, hearing on May 25

በAI የተዘገበ በ AI የተሰራ ምስል

The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the death of Twisha Sharma. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant will hear the matter on May 25.

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant warned on Friday against growing attacks on the judiciary by unemployed individuals posing as media and RTI activists. He made the remarks while hearing a plea by advocate Sanjay Dubey. The Supreme Court dismissed the plea and called for probes into fake law degrees.

በAI የተዘገበ

The Delhi high court observed on Monday that courts cannot prevent people from making fun of public figures unless the remarks are humiliating or disparaging. The bench made these remarks while hearing Patanjali Ayurveda managing director Acharya Balakrishna’s plea seeking protection for his personality rights.

India's Supreme Court indicated on Wednesday that uniform guidelines on judicial intervention in faith and rights disputes are neither feasible nor desirable, preferring case-by-case assessments. The observation came during the seventh day of hearings on the Sabarimala Temple entry reference.

በAI የተዘገበ

The Supreme Court has asked the Gujarat and Maharashtra governments to respond to appeals by two convicts in the 2002 Bilkis Bano gangrape case. Justices Rajesh Bindal and Vijay Bishnoi issued notices and set a hearing for May 5. The appeals challenge the Bombay high court's 2017 conviction and life sentence.

Three educators blacklisted by India's Supreme Court over a controversial chapter in an NCERT Class 8 textbook have sought a hearing. The chapter covered corruption in the judiciary. Chief Justice Kant agreed to hear them.

ይህ ድረ-ገጽ ኩኪዎችን ይጠቀማል

የእኛን ጣቢያ ለማሻሻል ለትንታኔ ኩኪዎችን እንጠቀማለን። የእኛን የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ አንብቡ የሚስጥር ፖሊሲ ለተጨማሪ መረጃ።
ውድቅ አድርግ