Families of slain civil rights workers protest Supreme Court Louisiana redistricting ruling outside the court building
Families of slain civil rights workers protest Supreme Court Louisiana redistricting ruling outside the court building
Billede genereret af AI

Families of slain civil rights workers decry Supreme Court’s Louisiana redistricting ruling, urge voter turnout

Billede genereret af AI
Faktatjekket

Relatives of three civil rights-era activists killed in the 1960s said they were dismayed by the Supreme Court’s April 29 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, a 6–3 decision that struck down Louisiana’s congressional map and sharply narrowed how Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting challenges. They urged Americans to respond by voting and supporting efforts to strengthen federal voting protections.

Family members of civil rights workers killed during the movement in the 1960s expressed frustration with the Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais, handed down on April 29, 2026.

In that case, the Court, by a 6–3 vote, left in place a lower-court ruling that blocked Louisiana from using a congressional map that created a second majority-Black district, concluding the map amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. In the majority opinion, the Court also interpreted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in a way critics say makes it far harder for plaintiffs to win vote-dilution claims in redistricting cases.

Anthony Liuzzo, a son of Viola Liuzzo, pointed to his mother’s murder in Alabama in March 1965 after she went to support the Selma-to-Montgomery voting rights marches. He said the Court’s ruling undercut safeguards that activists’ sacrifices helped secure, and he urged eligible voters to keep turning out at the polls.

Dennis Dahmer, a son of Mississippi NAACP leader Vernon Dahmer, whose home was attacked by Ku Klux Klan members in January 1966 and who died from injuries sustained in the firebombing, described the decision as part of a long-running effort to weaken the Voting Rights Act. He also argued that low turnout has enabled decades of erosion in voting protections.

David Goodman, brother of Andrew Goodman—one of three voting-rights workers murdered in Mississippi in June 1964—said the ruling fit a broader pattern of the Court narrowing civil rights protections. He said the response should begin with casting ballots.

The remarks followed the publication of interviews dated July 27, 2026, in which the families connected their relatives’ deaths to the era that produced landmark civil rights legislation, including the Voting Rights Act signed into law under President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965.

Relaterede artikler

Illustration of Supreme Court ruling against Louisiana redistricting map
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana congressional map, tightening limits on race-conscious redistricting

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

The US Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Callais v. Louisiana, significantly weakening Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act following October 2025 oral arguments. Critics argue the ruling, led by the Republican-appointed majority, invites states to redraw maps entrenching racial disenfranchisement. Republicans expressed satisfaction with the outcome.

Rapporteret af AI

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana—which struck down a second majority-Black congressional district as racial gerrymandering—civil rights advocates in the Deep South have condemned the decision as a threat to Black representation. States including Alabama, Tennessee, and Louisiana are redrawing maps, prompting vows of lawsuits and midterm mobilization.

In response to the Supreme Court's Callais v. Louisiana decision curtailing Voting Rights Act protections (as covered in this series), Alabama lawmakers have begun a special session to reinstate 2023 congressional maps if courts lift a prior ban. Critics say the move would undermine Black representation.

Rapporteret af AI

In a follow-up to its April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned order on May 5 allowing the decision—striking down the state's congressional map as a racial gerrymander—to take effect immediately. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurrence, sharply criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's lone dissent as 'baseless' and 'insulting,' highlighting tensions amid 2026 election battles.

A POLITICO/Public First survey conducted May 9–11 finds a plurality of Democrats say their party should respond to Republican redistricting efforts even if it results in fewer majority-minority districts. The results come weeks after the Supreme Court’s April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which narrowed how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting disputes.

Rapporteret af AI

Thousands gathered in Montgomery, Alabama, on Saturday to protest recent Supreme Court rulings on congressional districts and to retrace steps from the 1965 civil rights march.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis