Judge orders special elections for Mississippi Supreme Court

A federal judge has ordered special elections for the Mississippi Supreme Court after ruling that the state's electoral map violates voting rights. The decision stems from a lawsuit claiming the map dilutes Black voters' influence. New elections could occur as early as November 2026.

In Jackson, Mississippi, U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock issued an order on Friday directing the state to hold special elections for its Supreme Court. This follows her August ruling that the current electoral map, in place since 1987, breaches Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting the power of Black voters.

The map splits Mississippi's Delta region—a historically Black area—in half, weakening Black voting strength in the Central District, according to a 2022 lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Mississippi is nearly 40% Black, yet the nine-member court has never had more than one Black justice at a time. Only four Black individuals have ever served, all appointed to the same Central District seat by governors.

Judge Aycock has given the Mississippi Legislature until the end of its 2026 regular session to redraw the map. Once approved, she plans to swiftly schedule special elections for November 2026, though she will decide affected seats later. The state's nonpartisan Supreme Court elections will fill vacancies created after two justices were recently appointed to federal judgeships; Governor Tate Reeves will name interim replacements.

Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, welcomed the ruling: "We couldn't be happier to see justice on the horizon."

The Mississippi Secretary of State's Office is appealing the August decision. The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has paused proceedings while awaiting outcomes from related cases, including a U.S. Supreme Court challenge to Section 2. The offices of the Secretary of State and Attorney General did not immediately comment.

Relaterede artikler

Illustration of lawyers arguing over redistricting maps in a Supreme Court-like courtroom, representing lawsuits in Florida, Utah, Virginia, and Louisiana ahead of 2026 midterms.
Billede genereret af AI

Redistricting lawsuits mount ahead of the 2026 midterms, with major cases in Florida, Utah, Virginia and Louisiana

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

Legal fights over congressional maps are accelerating in multiple states as both parties maneuver for advantage before the November 2026 elections. A high-profile U.S. Supreme Court case involving Louisiana’s congressional map could have broader implications for how race is considered in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.

Republicans' hopes for a Supreme Court decision to weaken the Voting Rights Act and enable favorable redistricting before the 2026 midterms are fading as election timelines tighten. The case, Louisiana v. Callais, could allow the GOP to redraw maps in the South to gain more congressional seats, but experts predict a ruling too late for implementation. State officials warn that changing maps now would create logistical chaos for elections.

Rapporteret af AI

The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on October 15, 2025, in Callais v. Louisiana, a case challenging whether creating a second majority-Black congressional district violates the Constitution. Conservative justices appeared inclined to limit Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, potentially allowing Republicans to gain up to 19 House seats. The ruling could reshape minority representation in Congress.

Indiana’s Republican-led Senate has rejected a Trump-backed congressional map that would likely have given the GOP all nine of the state’s U.S. House seats, despite an aggressive months-long pressure campaign from the White House, even as redistricting battles elsewhere and a looming Supreme Court case shape the national landscape.

Rapporteret af AI Faktatjekket

The U.S. Supreme Court said Monday, Nov. 10, it will hear a Mississippi case testing whether states may count mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but delivered soon after. The suit, led by the Republican National Committee, targets Mississippi’s five‑business‑day grace period and could affect practices in 16 states plus several U.S. territories, according to NPR.

Maryland's Democratic leaders have approved a proposal to redraw congressional districts, potentially eliminating the state's only Republican-held U.S. House seat ahead of the 2026 midterms. The plan, recommended by a governor-appointed commission, would reshape the 1st District to favor Democrats. While supporters cite population changes and actions in other states, critics from both parties warn of partisan overreach and legal risks.

Rapporteret af AI Faktatjekket

Democratic state attorneys general have stepped up legal and political efforts ahead of the 2026 midterm elections as President Donald Trump promotes federal changes to election rules, including a House-passed bill tied to proof of citizenship. A Heritage Action-commissioned poll reported majority support for those requirements in five states.

 

 

 

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis