Judge orders special elections for Mississippi Supreme Court

A federal judge has ordered special elections for the Mississippi Supreme Court after ruling that the state's electoral map violates voting rights. The decision stems from a lawsuit claiming the map dilutes Black voters' influence. New elections could occur as early as November 2026.

In Jackson, Mississippi, U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock issued an order on Friday directing the state to hold special elections for its Supreme Court. This follows her August ruling that the current electoral map, in place since 1987, breaches Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting the power of Black voters.

The map splits Mississippi's Delta region—a historically Black area—in half, weakening Black voting strength in the Central District, according to a 2022 lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Mississippi is nearly 40% Black, yet the nine-member court has never had more than one Black justice at a time. Only four Black individuals have ever served, all appointed to the same Central District seat by governors.

Judge Aycock has given the Mississippi Legislature until the end of its 2026 regular session to redraw the map. Once approved, she plans to swiftly schedule special elections for November 2026, though she will decide affected seats later. The state's nonpartisan Supreme Court elections will fill vacancies created after two justices were recently appointed to federal judgeships; Governor Tate Reeves will name interim replacements.

Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Voting Rights Project, welcomed the ruling: "We couldn't be happier to see justice on the horizon."

The Mississippi Secretary of State's Office is appealing the August decision. The Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has paused proceedings while awaiting outcomes from related cases, including a U.S. Supreme Court challenge to Section 2. The offices of the Secretary of State and Attorney General did not immediately comment.

Verwandte Artikel

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court handling redistricting cases from Mississippi and North Dakota
Bild generiert von KI

Supreme court sends redistricting cases back to lower courts

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order sending Mississippi and North Dakota state legislative map cases back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of its recent Louisiana v. Callais ruling.

The Supreme Court on Monday issued two unexplained orders returning voting rights cases from Mississippi and North Dakota to lower courts for reconsideration. The moves follow the court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais that reshaped Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from both orders.

Von KI berichtet

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 unsigned order Tuesday night permitting Alabama to implement a congressional map that eliminates a district held by a Black Democrat. The decision applies and expands the Court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Von KI berichtet

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, Callais v. Louisiana decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map as a racial gerrymander (as covered in this series), experts warn the reinterpretation of Voting Rights Act protections could endanger minority representation nationwide. Louisiana has extended suspension of its U.S. House primaries until at least July 2026 amid expectations of a redraw.

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

Von KI berichtet

Tennessee Republicans voted Thursday to pass new congressional maps expected to eliminate the state's only Democratic U.S. House seat. Republican Governor Bill Lee signed the measure into law shortly afterward. The move followed a Supreme Court decision striking down certain majority-black districts as unconstitutional racial gerrymandering.

 

 

 

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen