Illustration of adults in a study eating foods with processed fats, monitored by a researcher, highlighting neutral effects on heart health markers.
Illustration of adults in a study eating foods with processed fats, monitored by a researcher, highlighting neutral effects on heart health markers.
Billede genereret af AI

Randomized trial finds certain processed hard fats did not worsen short-term heart risk markers

Billede genereret af AI
Faktatjekket

A small randomized crossover study found no meaningful differences in cholesterol or other short‑term cardiometabolic markers when healthy adults consumed either palmitic‑rich or stearic‑rich interesterified fats for six weeks apiece.

Researchers at King's College London and Maastricht University tested two kinds of interesterified fats—hard fats used to replace trans fats and some animal fats—in everyday foods such as margarines, pastries and spreads. The work, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, examined blends rich in palmitic acid (from palm oil) or stearic acid (from other plant fats).

Study design
- Forty‑seven healthy adults completed a double‑blind, randomized crossover trial.
- Each participant consumed two six‑week diets featuring muffins and spreads made with one of the fats, supplying about 10% of daily energy.
- Researchers assessed blood lipids, triglycerides, insulin sensitivity, liver fat, inflammatory markers and vascular function.

Findings
- The trial found no meaningful differences between the two fats in blood cholesterol or triglycerides, including the total‑to‑HDL cholesterol ratio, a key cardiovascular risk marker.
- Measures of inflammation, insulin resistance, liver fat and vascular function showed no evidence of harm over the study periods. (The journal abstract notes a small difference in one cytokine, IL‑10, with the palmitic‑rich fat versus the stearic‑rich fat; other outcomes were unchanged.)

What they said
- “Not all food processing is bad for us … this research is timely,” said senior author Professor Sarah Berry of King’s College London.
- Lead author Professor Wendy Hall said the results offer “reassuring evidence” that these industrially processed fats, when eaten in amounts typical of everyday diets, are unlikely to have harmful short‑term effects on cardiovascular risk markers.

Caveats and funding
- The study tested short‑term biomarker changes over six‑week diet periods in healthy adults; longer studies are needed to evaluate chronic effects.
- The research was supported by the Malaysian Palm Oil Board.

Relaterede artikler

A realistic image depicting a woman checking food labels with a blood pressure monitor, illustrating the link between preservatives and hypertension.
Billede genereret af AI

French NutriNet-Santé study links eight food preservatives to higher hypertension risk

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

A large French study of 112,395 adults has found that higher consumption of certain food preservative additives—especially non-antioxidant preservatives—was associated with increased incidence of hypertension and, for some exposures, cardiovascular disease. The findings were published online May 20, 2026, in the European Heart Journal.

New research from Yale shows that oleic acid, the main fat in olive oil, accelerated tumor growth in mice prone to pancreatic cancer, while omega-3 fats from fish oil cut disease development by half.

Rapporteret af AI

Researchers have developed an improved testing approach for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, which can form in foods cooked at high temperatures.

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis