Illustration of Supreme Court ruling on gun rights for marijuana users
Illustration of Supreme Court ruling on gun rights for marijuana users
Billede genereret af AI

Supreme Court narrows gun law for marijuana users

Billede genereret af AI

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled Thursday that federal prosecutors violated the Second Amendment by charging a Texas man with illegal firearm possession for using marijuana. The decision in United States v. Hemani limits the reach of a 1968 law banning gun ownership by unlawful drug users. Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the opinion, stressing its narrow scope.

The court sided with Ali Hemani, a 27-year-old who admitted to smoking marijuana approximately every other day. FBI agents found a handgun in his home that he kept for self-defense. Prosecutors had applied the statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which also featured in the Hunter Biden case.

Gorsuch explained that historical restrictions on “habitual drunkards” did not justify disarming regular marijuana users without evidence of addiction or danger. “We do not address efforts to ban addicts, or those presently intoxicated, from possessing a firearm,” he wrote. The ruling rejected the government’s analogy to founding-era laws.

Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Elena Kagan, filed a separate opinion agreeing with the outcome. Second Amendment advocates praised the decision, including Judicial Crisis Network President Carrie Severino, who called it a unanimous affirmation based on history and tradition.

The justices clarified that the government may still disarm dangerous individuals or felons. The case drew attention for acknowledging widespread acceptance of cannabis across states.

Hvad folk siger

Initial reactions on X to the unanimous Supreme Court ruling in United States v. Hemani highlighted its narrow scope limiting the federal gun ban for marijuana users, with journalists reporting factually, users celebrating expanded rights, and some noting the decision's limited impact beyond regular non-impaired users.

Relaterede artikler

Federal appeals court judges rule in favor of Hobby Distillers Association, striking down U.S. ban on home distilling.
Billede genereret af AI

US appeals court strikes down Reconstruction-era federal ban on home distilling as unconstitutional

Rapporteret af AI Billede genereret af AI Faktatjekket

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled that a longstanding federal prohibition on distilling spirits at home cannot be justified as an exercise of Congress’s taxing power, siding with the Hobby Distillers Association and four of its members.

The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that certain plea agreements waiving appeal rights can be set aside if enforcing them would cause a manifest miscarriage of justice. The 8-1 decision, written by Justice Elena Kagan, reversed a Fifth Circuit ruling in a fraud case involving Munson Hunter.

Rapporteret af AI

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented in a case involving a Vermont state police sergeant's use of force against a nonviolent protester, warning that the majority granted officers a 'license to inflict gratuitous pain.' The decision reversed a lower court's ruling denying qualified immunity to Sgt. Jacob Zorn. Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, argued the action violated the Fourth Amendment.

The U.S. Supreme Court on April 20, 2026, granted a petition from Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department officers and sent the death case of Roy Anthony Scott back to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reconsider in light of the court’s March 23 decision in Zorn v. Linton.

Rapporteret af AI

Antonella Barba, a former contestant on American Idol, has admitted to violating the terms of her supervised release by using marijuana. Court officers reviewed the matter and recommended no formal punishment.

Dette websted bruger cookies

Vi bruger cookies til analyse for at forbedre vores side. Læs vores privatlivspolitik for mere information.
Afvis