Judge greenlights Justin Baldoni's Wayfarer defamation suit

A federal judge has ruled that Justin Baldoni's production company Wayfarer can move forward with its defamation claims against former publicist Stephanie Jones, according to court documents obtained by TMZ. The decision denies Jones' motion to dismiss the countersuit amid ongoing legal drama.

Oh honey, the It Ends With Us legal saga just got spicier! 👀 A federal judge ruled Thursday that Wayfarer Studios—Justin Baldoni's production company—can proceed with its defamation and bad faith claims against ex-publicist Stephanie Jones, per court docs snagged by TMZ. Published March 26, 2026, the ruling keeps the tea brewing hot. Wayfarer alleges Jones spilled false statements to Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and Lively's publicist Leslie Sloane, claiming the company retaliated against Blake for reporting alleged sexual misconduct and launched a smear campaign against her. Baldoni's team calls it all bogus and reputation-ruining. Back in December 2024, Jones sued Wayfarer and publicist Jennifer Abel—who handled Baldoni's account under Jones—for breach of contract. Wayfarer and Abel fired back, accusing Jones of swiping texts from her phone and leaking them to Lively's camp. A Wayfarer rep dished to TMZ: “We’re pleased with the Court’s decision to deny Stephanie Jones’ attempt to dismiss Wayfarer’s lawsuit and to allow our core claims, including defamation and bad faith conduct, to move forward.” They went harder: “As alleged in Wayfarer’s counterclaims, after being notified that her contract would be terminated, Stephanie Jones of Jonesworks turned against her longtime client, sharing internal communications and pushing false allegations that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties orchestrated a so-called 'smear campaign.’ The Court rejected her effort to dismiss these claims, allowing them to proceed as serious allegations that deserve to be examined on the facts, including that she acted in bad faith by misusing internal information and communications. This is not a minor dispute.” Messy much? With discovery looming, will more texts drop? Spill it, court! 🔥

Verwandte Artikel

Courtroom illustration depicting Justin Baldoni's team objecting to Blake Lively's exhibits including a Taylor Swift cookie recipe in their trial.
Bild generiert von KI

Justin Baldoni objects to Blake Lively's trial exhibits including Taylor Swift recipe

Von KI berichtet Bild generiert von KI

Justin Baldoni's legal team is pushing back against Blake Lively's last-minute filing of 68 exhibits, calling out irrelevant items like a Taylor Swift cookie recipe link. They want more time to review and narrow the list ahead of the May 18 trial. Meanwhile, both sides collaborated on juror questions name-dropping A-listers like Swift and Ryan Reynolds.

The months-long courtroom clash between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni ended with an out-of-court settlement on May 4. Fresh comments from a co-star and insiders suggest the fallout continues to sting both sides.

Von KI berichtet

Nachdem Richter Lewis Liman im April 2026 den Großteil der Klage von Blake Lively gegen Justin Baldoni und Wayfarer Studios abgewiesen hat (siehe frühere Berichterstattung), schreitet der Fall mit den Vergeltungsvorwürfen voran, wobei der Prozessauftakt für den 18. Mai in New York City angesetzt ist. Jüngste Anträge, Zeugenlisten und Streitigkeiten mit Versicherern verschärfen weiterhin den Konflikt, der aus der Produktion von 'It Ends With Us' hervorgegangen ist.

A federal judge in Florida dismissed President Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over a story linking him to Jeffrey Epstein. U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles ruled that Trump failed to adequately allege actual malice, but allowed an amended complaint. The decision came Monday following a July lawsuit prompted by the newspaper's report on a 2003 letter.

Von KI berichtet

Tyra Banks hat am Samstag wegen der Dokumentarserie Reality Check: Inside America's Next Top Model Verleumdungsklage gegen Netflix eingereicht. Die Klage behauptet, die Serie habe durch den selektiven Schnitt ihres Interviews eine falsche Darstellung ihrer Person erzeugt.

Diese Website verwendet Cookies

Wir verwenden Cookies für Analysen, um unsere Website zu verbessern. Lesen Sie unsere Datenschutzrichtlinie für weitere Informationen.
Ablehnen