Bundestag debates Trisomy tests and abortion consequences

The Bundestag will debate on Friday a joint motion from CDU/CSU, SPD, Greens and Left on non-invasive prenatal tests (NIPT) for trisomies. Lawmakers demand data on usage and ethical impacts, as about half of pregnant women use the tests. Critics warn of overuse, while gynecologists emphasize counseling.

Lawmakers from all major parties have submitted a rare joint motion calling for detailed tracking of NIPT usage. These blood tests detect Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 prenatally and have been covered by insurers since 2022 for risk cases. According to Barmer, about 50 percent of pregnant women use the test, rising to 75 percent for those over 40. The proposers see misguided incentives and demand monitoring until 2027 plus an expert commission for ethical review. „It can be feared that pregnant women are recommended to take the NIPT regardless of medical relevance,“ states the motion. The German gynecologists' association counters: „The decision for or against NIPT is a self-determined choice of the pregnant woman after open-ended counseling.“ Wolf-Dietrich Trenner of the Down Syndrome Working Group Germany supports it: „That will hurt again.“ Estimates suggest a 90 percent abortion rate for positive Trisomy 21 results. Prenatal specialist Kai-Sven Helig advocates access for all: „Every woman has the right not to want a disabled child.“ Affected individuals like Adrian Hackenthal criticize: „This shows us affected people that our lives are worthless.“ Alexandra Althaus of the Down Syndrome Federal Association warns that fewer births hinder participation. Germany has an estimated 30,000 to 50,000 people with Trisomy 21, but no birth statistics exist.

Related Articles

Biological father and son celebrating outside the Bundestag after law strengthens paternity rights for unmarried fathers.
Image generated by AI

Bundestag strengthens rights of biological fathers

Reported by AI Image generated by AI

The Bundestag has passed a law making it easier for biological fathers to assert their paternity legally. The reform implements a ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court and lowers hurdles for unmarried fathers. The long fight of one father contributed to this success.

A new book by bioethicist Daphne O. Martschenko and sociologist Sam Trejo explores the implications of polygenic scores in genetic testing, highlighting potential inequalities and myths surrounding genetics. Through their 'adversarial collaboration,' the authors debate whether such research can promote equity or entrench social divides. They call for stricter regulation to ensure responsible use.

Reported by AI

The Bundestag will debate a new violence protection law for the first time on Friday, which can require violent offenders in high-risk cases to wear an electronic ankle bracelet. CSU politician Susanne Hierl welcomes the draft but calls for additional measures such as mandatory social training courses and consequences for custody rights in cases of violence against mothers.

Kenya's Court of Appeal has ruled that abortion is not a fundamental right under the constitution, overturning a 2022 High Court decision. A three-judge bench in Malindi permitted terminations only when a qualified doctor determines a serious risk to the expectant mother's life.

Reported by AI Fact checked

A study published April 6, 2026, in JAMA Internal Medicine found that people seeking medication abortion often reached the same eligibility conclusions as clinicians when using prototype “over-the-counter-style” packaging and a drug facts label. Researchers and outside experts said the results add to evidence that self-screening could work, though any move to over-the-counter sales would face major regulatory and political hurdles.

Bootstrap Bio and Manhattan Genomics, biotech firms launched last year to pursue human embryo editing for preventing serious diseases, have closed their doors. The companies cited financial difficulties and internal conflicts as reasons for the shutdowns. The developments highlight challenges in the controversial field of gene-edited babies.

Reported by AI

Researchers have found that polygenic risk scores, which summarize a person's likelihood of developing diseases like diabetes and cancer, can be reverse-engineered to uncover underlying genetic data. This vulnerability raises privacy concerns, potentially allowing identification through public databases or reconstruction by insurers. The discovery highlights risks in sharing such scores, even anonymously.

 

 

 

This website uses cookies

We use cookies for analytics to improve our site. Read our privacy policy for more information.
Decline