El Tribunal Supremo de Virginia invalida el mapa de redistribución de distritos tras un referéndum

El Tribunal Supremo de Virginia ha anulado un mapa electoral aprobado por los votantes en un referéndum reciente, dictaminando que es inconstitucional. Los líderes demócratas han criticado la decisión al considerarla una anulación de la voluntad popular.

El fallo se produjo el 8 de mayo en una opinión del juez D. Arthur Kelsey. El tribunal determinó que los demócratas de Virginia habían solicitado que cualquier revisión se pospusiera hasta después de la votación, citando precedentes que impedían la intervención mientras la medida seguía bajo consideración de los votantes. Solo alrededor de 1,6 millones de los 3 millones de participantes apoyaron el mapa en el referéndum.

Artículos relacionados

Virginia Supreme Court justices rejecting a redistricting map in a courtroom setting
Imagen generada por IA

Virginia supreme court strikes down redistricting referendum

Reportado por IA Imagen generada por IA

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled Friday that a voter-approved redistricting plan violated state constitutional procedures. The 4-3 decision nullifies the April referendum and keeps the state's existing congressional maps in place. Democrats had sought the change to gain a stronger edge ahead of the 2026 midterms.

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

Reportado por IA

The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a newly drawn congressional map favored by Democrats is unconstitutional, overturning the results of a special election and leaving the state with its previous boundaries.

A recent poll indicates narrow support for a mid-decade redistricting amendment in Virginia, with likely voters backing it 52-47%. The measure aims to redraw congressional maps from a 6-5 Democratic edge to 10-1 in their favor, potentially affecting House control during President Donald Trump's term. Early voting ends April 18, with the ballot decision on April 21.

Reportado por IA

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 unsigned order Tuesday night permitting Alabama to implement a congressional map that eliminates a district held by a Black Democrat. The decision applies and expands the Court's recent ruling in Louisiana v. Callais. Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Reportado por IA Verificado por hechos

A three-judge federal panel on Tuesday barred Alabama from using a Republican-backed congressional map for the 2026 elections, finding the plan was tainted by intentional race-based discrimination against Black voters. The panel included two judges appointed by President Donald Trump.

 

 

 

Este sitio web utiliza cookies

Utilizamos cookies para análisis con el fin de mejorar nuestro sitio. Lee nuestra política de privacidad para más información.
Rechazar