Suprema Corte da Virgínia invalida mapa de redistritamento após referendo

A Suprema Corte da Virgínia anulou um mapa congressional aprovado pelos eleitores em um referendo recente, decidindo que ele é inconstitucional. Líderes democratas criticaram a decisão como uma anulação da vontade popular.

A decisão foi tomada em 8 de maio em um parecer do juiz D. Arthur Kelsey. O tribunal constatou que os democratas da Virgínia haviam solicitado que qualquer análise fosse adiada até depois da votação, citando um precedente que impedia a intervenção enquanto a medida ainda estava sob consideração dos eleitores. Apenas cerca de 1,6 milhão dos 3 milhões de participantes apoiaram o mapa no referendo.

Artigos relacionados

Virginia Supreme Court justices rejecting a redistricting map in a courtroom setting
Imagem gerada por IA

Virginia supreme court strikes down redistricting referendum

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

The Supreme Court of Virginia ruled Friday that a voter-approved redistricting plan violated state constitutional procedures. The 4-3 decision nullifies the April referendum and keeps the state's existing congressional maps in place. Democrats had sought the change to gain a stronger edge ahead of the 2026 midterms.

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved redistricting plan that Democrats hoped would add four House seats. The 4-3 ruling cited a procedural error in how the measure reached the ballot. The decision comes amid a broader wave of Republican-led map changes in Southern states.

Reportado por IA

The Virginia Supreme Court has ruled that a newly drawn congressional map favored by Democrats is unconstitutional, overturning the results of a special election and leaving the state with its previous boundaries.

A recent poll indicates narrow support for a mid-decade redistricting amendment in Virginia, with likely voters backing it 52-47%. The measure aims to redraw congressional maps from a 6-5 Democratic edge to 10-1 in their favor, potentially affecting House control during President Donald Trump's term. Early voting ends April 18, with the ballot decision on April 21.

Reportado por IA

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29 that Louisiana's congressional map, which included a second majority-Black district, constitutes an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act requires proof of intentional discrimination, not just disparate impact. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, limits race-based redistricting and prompts new maps in several states.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, Callais v. Louisiana decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map as a racial gerrymander (as covered in this series), experts warn the reinterpretation of Voting Rights Act protections could endanger minority representation nationwide. Louisiana has extended suspension of its U.S. House primaries until at least July 2026 amid expectations of a redraw.

Reportado por IA

South Carolina Republican lawmakers failed Tuesday to secure the votes needed to extend the legislative session and redraw congressional maps, stalling efforts pushed by President Donald Trump to eliminate the state's only Democratic-held House district.

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar