Slate’s Amicus examines Roberts-era limits on tariff authority and executive power

तथ्य-जाँच किया गया

A February 28, 2026 episode of Slate’s legal podcast Amicus features former U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. in conversation with host Dahlia Lithwick about the Supreme Court’s tariff dispute and broader questions about executive power, including what the episode describes as the Justice Department’s shifting relationship with facts.

The Feb. 28, 2026 episode of Slate’s Amicus, titled “Chief Justice John Roberts’ take on tariffs,” features Slate courts writer Dahlia Lithwick interviewing Donald Verrilli Jr., who served as U.S. solicitor general under President Barack Obama and previously clerked for Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in the 1980s.

In the episode description distributed via podcast platforms, the discussion centers on a Supreme Court tariff fight and what it suggests about limits on presidential power. The description says Lithwick and Verrilli discuss whether Chief Justice John Roberts is “at last” signaling skepticism about President Donald Trump’s policymaking, how the Justice Department’s handling of facts may affect its credibility, and what it can cost when the Court issues delayed or fractured opinions in major executive-power cases.

The episode description also says Verrilli reflects on his decades of Supreme Court litigation experience—spanning his Brennan clerkship, his government service during the Obama administration, and later arguments before the Court—and argues that confronting present-day rule-of-law pressures requires what it calls a “hard-nosed faith.”

The same description introduces Executive Dysfunction, described as a new newsletter from Slate’s jurisprudence team focused on under-the-radar legal developments tied to Trump’s actions and the legal system’s response.

Amicus is Slate’s podcast about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices, hosted by Lithwick.

संबंधित लेख

Illustration of the U.S. Supreme Court building with podcast elements and tariff documents, symbolizing a podcast episode on legal challenges to Trump administration policies.
AI द्वारा उत्पन्न छवि

Amicus episode spotlights lower-court pushback and a looming Supreme Court tariff fight

AI द्वारा रिपोर्ट किया गया AI द्वारा उत्पन्न छवि तथ्य-जाँच किया गया

In a Nov. 1, 2025 episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick examines how lower federal courts are confronting key Trump administration moves—on due process and domestic deployments—and previews this week’s Supreme Court arguments over the president’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. According to Slate, the episode also features Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, a lead plaintiff in the tariff challenge.

In a new episode of Slate’s Amicus, host Dahlia Lithwick and guest Joyce White Vance discuss the Justice Department under Attorney General Pam Bondi and President Donald Trump, using the week’s bulldozer imagery—and the real demolition of the White House’s East Wing—as a backdrop to examine pursuits of political opponents and congressional inaction. Vance’s new book outlines how citizens can help sustain democratic institutions.

AI द्वारा रिपोर्ट किया गया

In a recent Slate Plus episode of Amicus, legal experts Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss strategies for a future Democratic president to repair damage from a potential Trump administration. They argue for using expanded executive powers granted by the Supreme Court to undo harms like mass deportations and agency purges. The conversation emphasizes aggressive action on day one to restore norms and democracy.

President Donald Trump warned the US Supreme Court that a ruling against his reciprocal tariffs would cause massive financial chaos, following his call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. In a Truth Social post, Trump stated that overturning the tariffs would require refunding hundreds of billions of dollars and impact trillions in investments. The Court, skeptical in a November hearing, could annul the measures announced in April 2025.

AI द्वारा रिपोर्ट किया गया

In a recent episode of the Bar Fight podcast, commentator debated young Democrats Harry Sisson and Chris Mowrey on President Trump's policies. The discussion covered criticisms of ICE raids, tariffs, and the handling of Jeffrey Epstein files, but the participants struggled to propose specific alternatives. The exchange highlighted ongoing political divides ahead of midterm elections.

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on December 8, 2025, in Trump v. Slaughter, a case examining whether President Donald Trump may remove Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Kelly Slaughter without cause. The justices’ questions suggested a sharp divide over limits on presidential power and the future of a 90‑year‑old precedent that has helped insulate independent agencies from at‑will firings.

AI द्वारा रिपोर्ट किया गया

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

 

 

 

यह वेबसाइट कुकीज़ का उपयोग करती है

हम अपनी साइट को बेहतर बनाने के लिए विश्लेषण के लिए कुकीज़ का उपयोग करते हैं। अधिक जानकारी के लिए हमारी गोपनीयता नीति पढ़ें।
अस्वीकार करें