Slate’s Amicus examines Roberts-era limits on tariff authority and executive power

Проверено фактами

A February 28, 2026 episode of Slate’s legal podcast Amicus features former U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. in conversation with host Dahlia Lithwick about the Supreme Court’s tariff dispute and broader questions about executive power, including what the episode describes as the Justice Department’s shifting relationship with facts.

The Feb. 28, 2026 episode of Slate’s Amicus, titled “Chief Justice John Roberts’ take on tariffs,” features Slate courts writer Dahlia Lithwick interviewing Donald Verrilli Jr., who served as U.S. solicitor general under President Barack Obama and previously clerked for Justice William J. Brennan Jr. in the 1980s.

In the episode description distributed via podcast platforms, the discussion centers on a Supreme Court tariff fight and what it suggests about limits on presidential power. The description says Lithwick and Verrilli discuss whether Chief Justice John Roberts is “at last” signaling skepticism about President Donald Trump’s policymaking, how the Justice Department’s handling of facts may affect its credibility, and what it can cost when the Court issues delayed or fractured opinions in major executive-power cases.

The episode description also says Verrilli reflects on his decades of Supreme Court litigation experience—spanning his Brennan clerkship, his government service during the Obama administration, and later arguments before the Court—and argues that confronting present-day rule-of-law pressures requires what it calls a “hard-nosed faith.”

The same description introduces Executive Dysfunction, described as a new newsletter from Slate’s jurisprudence team focused on under-the-radar legal developments tied to Trump’s actions and the legal system’s response.

Amicus is Slate’s podcast about the law and the nine Supreme Court justices, hosted by Lithwick.

Связанные статьи

Illustration of Slate’s Amicus podcast hosts Dahlia Lithwick and Rachel Laser discussing Christian nationalism and church-state separation.
Изображение, созданное ИИ

Slate’s Amicus examines Christian nationalism and church-state separation in a new episode with Americans United’s Rachel Laser

Сообщено ИИ Изображение, созданное ИИ Проверено фактами

A new episode of Slate’s “Amicus” podcast features host Dahlia Lithwick in conversation with Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, about the modern push for Christian nationalism and the legal and political fights over church-state separation.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on February 20, 2026, in Learning Resources v. Trump that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) exceeded his authority. Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion invoked the major-questions doctrine to limit executive power over taxation, while concurring liberal justices emphasized statutory text and legislative history. The decision, expedited due to ongoing tariff revenue collection, spares some targeted duties but introduces uncertainty amid Trump's vows for alternatives.

Сообщено ИИ

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

In a Feb. 8, 2026 episode of The Nation’s “The Time of Monsters,” host Jeet Heer interviewed journalist Josh Kovensky about his Talking Points Memo essay arguing that federal prosecutors under President Donald Trump have increasingly pursued terrorism-related charges in cases involving groups Trump has publicly attacked.

Сообщено ИИ

Following the Supreme Court's rejection of his emergency tariff powers and Trump's subsequent 15% global tariff announcement, Democrats are framing the policy as a midterm vulnerability on affordability, while Republicans tout economic benefits amid new data showing sluggish growth.

Этот сайт использует куки

Мы используем куки для анализа, чтобы улучшить наш сайт. Прочитайте нашу политику конфиденциальности для дополнительной информации.
Отклонить