Courtroom scene in Hawaii where state attorneys discover no documented harms from Trump-era Medicaid-DHS data sharing policy.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Hawaii Has Not Documented Harm From Trump Medicaid–DHS Data Policy, Records Show

Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI
Fakta terverifikasi

Hawaii, one of 20 states suing the Trump administration over the sharing of Medicaid beneficiary data with the Department of Homeland Security, told a federal court it has no records showing data leaks, enrollment declines, or other concrete harms stemming from the policy, according to filings cited by America First Legal.

Hawaii is among 20 states that have sued the Trump administration over a federal policy allowing Medicaid beneficiary data to be shared with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). The lawsuit alleges that the data-sharing arrangement endangers Medicaid enrollees and could increase the risk of deportation for noncitizens.

According to court filings described by The Daily Wire, America First Legal, a conservative legal group, served records demands on Hawaii seeking documents that would show specific harms tied to the policy. The group requested evidence of data leaks or improper disclosures, examples of Medicaid information reaching immigration enforcement officials, increased hospital costs or uncompensated care, drops in enrollment or reluctance from noncitizens to seek coverage, added administrative burdens, patient deaths or adverse outcomes, and any interference with the state’s ability to administer its Medicaid program.

Filings cited by The Daily Wire indicate that Hawaii responded it did not have records responsive to those requests. In a declaration quoted by the outlet, the state reported: “As far as Med-QUEST is aware, CMS has not disclosed Medicaid PII data for Hawai‘i Medicaid enrollees to date.”

Hawaii’s Medicaid program, Med-QUEST, is administered by the state Department of Human Services. Court filings referenced by The Daily Wire state that Med-QUEST provides health coverage to roughly 400,000 low‑income Hawaii residents and that the state administers federally funded emergency Medicaid benefits that pay for emergency care for individuals regardless of immigration status. Like other states, Hawaii regularly transfers protected health information about its Medicaid enrollees to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), including data submitted to the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T‑MSIS).

Despite this longstanding data-sharing with CMS, Hawaii and other plaintiff states argue in their lawsuit that the Trump administration’s more recent arrangement giving DHS access to Medicaid data poses distinct risks, particularly for noncitizen enrollees. Federal documents and reporting by the Associated Press and other outlets have detailed how CMS, under pressure from Trump appointees, transferred personal data — including names, addresses and Social Security numbers — for certain immigrant Medicaid enrollees to DHS for immigration enforcement purposes.

America First Legal contends that Hawaii’s lack of documentary evidence of concrete harms means the state cannot show the “concrete and particularized injury” required to maintain the lawsuit. The group has advanced similar standing arguments in prior litigation involving California and Washington over other Trump-era executive orders, including those addressing gender‑related federal policy and citizenship protections, according to The Daily Wire.

America First Legal Vice President Dan Epstein argued that the absence of documented harm undermines Hawaii’s position in the case. “Without actual harm, Hawaii lacks standing to sue,” he said in a statement quoted by The Daily Wire. “The American people deserve better than having the federal courts clogged with political theater that obstructs the policies of a popularly elected President.”

Apa yang dikatakan orang

Discussions on X focus on America First Legal's revelation that Hawaii lacks records of harm from the Trump administration's Medicaid data-sharing policy with DHS, arguing the state has no standing to sue. Conservative influencers celebrate this as proof of political theater by Democrat-led states. High-engagement posts criticize the lawsuit and call for using the data against illegal immigration. No significant counterarguments or defenses from Hawaii supporters were found in recent posts.

Artikel Terkait

Diverse state AGs led by NY's Letitia James hold lawsuit papers against Trump admin outside courthouse, with US map, homeless tents, and HUD in background.
Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI

Dua puluh negara bagian menggugat untuk memblokir reformasi pendanaan tunawisma administrasi Trump

Dilaporkan oleh AI Gambar dihasilkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

Koalisi pejabat dari 20 negara bagian dan Distrik Columbia telah mengajukan gugatan terhadap administrasi Trump untuk menghentikan pembatasan baru pada inisiatif federal tunawisma yang telah lama berjalan. Gugatan yang dipimpin oleh Jaksa Agung New York Letitia James menargetkan perubahan kebijakan pada program Continuum of Care Departemen Perumahan dan Pembangunan Perkotaan yang mengalihkan dana dari penyedia “Housing First”.

Menyusul pernyataan HHS minggu lalu yang menyatakan perawatan afirmasi gender untuk anak di bawah umur tidak aman, koalisi 19 negara bagian dan Distrik Columbia mengajukan gugatan federal pada Selasa untuk menantang langkah tersebut. Dipimpin oleh Jaksa Agung New York Letitia James di pengadilan federal Oregon, gugatan tersebut berargumen bahwa pernyataan tersebut secara melanggar melewati standar medis dan berisiko mengecualikan penyedia dari Medicare dan Medicaid.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Sekitar dua lusin negara bagian, termasuk Minnesota, menolak tuntutan pemerintahan Trump untuk akses ke daftar pemilih mereka, memicu pertempuran hukum dengan Departemen Kehakiman. Pejabat Demokrat memandang dorongan ini sebagai kelebihan berwenang terkait klaim penipuan pemilu yang tidak berdasar. Pemerintahan bersikeras bahwa permintaan tersebut memastikan kepatuhan terhadap undang-undang pemilu federal.

Lima negara bagian yang dipimpin Demokrat menggugat administrasi Trump atas pembekuan dana kesejahteraan federal senilai 10 miliar dolar, dengan tuduhan motivasi politik. Hakim federal New York memblokir pembekuan secara sementara pada Jumat, memulihkan dana sementara kasus berlanjut.

Dilaporkan oleh AI Fakta terverifikasi

Seorang hakim federal di Boston mengeluarkan perintah baru yang menghalangi pemerintahan Trump menerapkan ketentuan Medicaid dalam One Big Beautiful Bill Act yang akan memotong dana untuk Planned Parenthood dan penyedia layanan serupa di lebih dari 20 negara bagian yang dipimpin Demokrat. Putusan tersebut, dalam gugatan yang diajukan oleh koalisi multi-negara bagian, menyatakan bahwa undang-undang tersebut kemungkinan melanggar batas konstitusional pengeluaran federal karena gagal memberi negara bagian pemberitahuan jelas tentang cara mematuhinya.

Agen Investigasi Keamanan Dalam Negeri melakukan pemeriksaan pintu ke pintu di Minneapolis pada Senin, menargetkan pusat penitipan anak dan layanan kesehatan yang diduga curang di tengah tuduhan penyalahgunaan dana pemerintah yang meluas. Penyelidikan ini menyusul video viral dari jurnalis independen Nick Shirley yang mengungkap fasilitas kosong yang menerima jutaan dana. Pejabat DHS dan FBI menekankan upaya berkelanjutan untuk membongkar skema penipuan skala besar yang mengeksploitasi program federal.

Dilaporkan oleh AI

Setelah video viral dari jurnalis Nick Shirley yang mengungkap penipuan nyata di tempat penitipan anak Minnesota yang dikelola Somali, pemerintahan Trump membekukan dana federal tahunan senilai 185 juta dolar yang mendukung 19.000 anak. Tindakan yang diumumkan pada 30 Desember di tengah penyelidikan yang sedang berlangsung telah memicu bentrokan partisan, dengan Gubernur Tim Walz menuduh politisasi.

 

 

 

Situs web ini menggunakan cookie

Kami menggunakan cookie untuk analisis guna meningkatkan situs kami. Baca kebijakan privasi kami untuk informasi lebih lanjut.
Tolak