Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

Immagine generata dall'IA

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

On January 22, 2026, former special counsel Jack Smith appeared before the House Judiciary Committee for hours of intense questioning about his role in indicting President Donald Trump on charges related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and mishandling of classified documents. Appointed in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Smith led the cases, which alleged Trump orchestrated efforts to block the 2020 election certification and retained sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort. Both cases were dismissed without prejudice after Trump won the 2024 election and returned to the White House.

Republicans, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), criticized the investigations as politically motivated. "It was always about politics and to get President Trump, they were willing to do almost anything," Jordan said. Lawmakers like Reps. Chip Roy (R-TX), Darrell Issa (R-CA), and Russell Fry (R-SC) targeted Smith's team's collection of phone records from congressional Republicans, including Kevin McCarthy and Scott Perry, around the Capitol riot. Roy noted his records were "indeed targeted" due to communications with Perry, which Smith said occurred before he assumed oversight. Issa compared the tactics to those of Richard Nixon's operatives, asking, "You, like the president’s men for Richard Nixon, went after your political enemies... weren’t you?" Fry accused Smith of an unconstitutional appointment, breaching a 60-day pre-election rule, evidence tampering in the Mar-a-Lago case, and unconstitutional subpoenas of Congress members without court notification.

Smith maintained his impartiality: "I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties. My office didn't spy on anyone." Responding to Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), he stated, "Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump is the person who caused Jan 6, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit the violence." He added, "We followed the facts and we followed the law. Where that led us was to an indictment of an unprecedented criminal scheme to block the peaceful transition of power." On the Capitol attack, which injured 140 officers, Smith said Trump was "by a large measure the most culpable" and responsible for crimes committed for his benefit. He expressed regret only for not better appreciating his team's sacrifices, many of whom were later fired.

Democrats, including Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), defended Smith, with Goldman calling Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon, who blocked parts of Smith's report, "completely lawless." Smith anticipated retaliation from the Trump Justice Department, stating, "I will not be intimidated," and believed it might indict him. During the hearing, Trump posted on Truth Social: "Deranged Jack Smith is being DECIMATED before Congress... Jack Smith is a deranged animal, who shouldn’t be allowed to practice Law."

This hearing followed a closed-door deposition in December 2025, whose transcript Republicans released. Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) suggested recalling Smith on the classified documents case, as Cannon's order may lift, amid pushes for the report's release despite Trump's lawyer's objections over grand jury materials.

Cosa dice la gente

Reactions on X to Jack Smith's January 22, 2026, testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on his Trump investigations are polarized. Left-leaning users and Democrats praised Smith for standing by evidence of Trump's criminal conduct in election subversion and classified documents cases, sharing clips of his firm statements. Conservative accounts claimed Republicans dismantled Smith's credibility, citing rushed pre-election timelines, hearsay reliance, and political motivations. Journalists noted tense exchanges and Democratic requests for additional hearings on the documents case.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of Jack Smith testifying in deposition, defending Trump-related prosecutions with Jan. 6 quote and symbolic imagery.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Transcript shows Jack Smith defending Trump prosecutions and saying Jan. 6 ‘does not happen’ without him

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

A House committee has released a transcript and video of former special counsel Jack Smith’s closed-door December deposition, in which he defended the Justice Department investigations that led to federal indictments of Donald Trump related to the 2020 election and classified documents.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ruled against the release of a report compiled by former special counsel Jack Smith regarding President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. Cannon described Smith’s efforts as a brazen attempt to circumvent her prior dismissal of charges against Trump. The decision emphasizes principles of fairness and justice in the absence of a guilt adjudication.

Riportato dall'IA

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

President Donald Trump's Justice Department faces a turbulent week marked by investigations into political foes and internal frustrations. Attorney General Pam Bondi is under scrutiny as Trump pushes for aggressive pursuits against his critics. Resignations and probes highlight deepening tensions within the administration.

Riportato dall'IA

Former FBI Director James Comey has told a federal appeals court that the Department of Justice cannot salvage its case against him due to an unlawful appointment of a prosecutor. Comey accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy, contrasting its stance here with its position in a prior Trump case. The dispute centers on Attorney General Pam Bondi's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney.

Former President Bill Clinton underwent a six-hour closed-door deposition before the House Oversight Committee in Chappaqua, New York, on his ties to Jeffrey Epstein, denying allegations he 'likes them young,' insisting he saw no abuse, and offering an unprompted defense of President Donald Trump. The compelled testimony, following subpoena battles and Hillary Clinton's prior session, highlighted scrutiny of Epstein's powerful associates amid new details on flights and post-conviction contacts.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

A federal judge in Virginia has dismissed the Justice Department’s criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that the acting U.S. attorney who secured the indictments was unlawfully appointed. The dismissals were issued without prejudice, leaving open the possibility that prosecutors could try to bring new charges.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta