Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

Immagine generata dall'IA

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

On January 22, 2026, former special counsel Jack Smith appeared before the House Judiciary Committee for hours of intense questioning about his role in indicting President Donald Trump on charges related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot and mishandling of classified documents. Appointed in November 2022 by then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Smith led the cases, which alleged Trump orchestrated efforts to block the 2020 election certification and retained sensitive materials at his Mar-a-Lago resort. Both cases were dismissed without prejudice after Trump won the 2024 election and returned to the White House.

Republicans, led by Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH), criticized the investigations as politically motivated. "It was always about politics and to get President Trump, they were willing to do almost anything," Jordan said. Lawmakers like Reps. Chip Roy (R-TX), Darrell Issa (R-CA), and Russell Fry (R-SC) targeted Smith's team's collection of phone records from congressional Republicans, including Kevin McCarthy and Scott Perry, around the Capitol riot. Roy noted his records were "indeed targeted" due to communications with Perry, which Smith said occurred before he assumed oversight. Issa compared the tactics to those of Richard Nixon's operatives, asking, "You, like the president’s men for Richard Nixon, went after your political enemies... weren’t you?" Fry accused Smith of an unconstitutional appointment, breaching a 60-day pre-election rule, evidence tampering in the Mar-a-Lago case, and unconstitutional subpoenas of Congress members without court notification.

Smith maintained his impartiality: "I am not a politician and I have no partisan loyalties. My office didn't spy on anyone." Responding to Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA), he stated, "Our investigation revealed that Donald Trump is the person who caused Jan 6, that it was foreseeable to him, and that he sought to exploit the violence." He added, "We followed the facts and we followed the law. Where that led us was to an indictment of an unprecedented criminal scheme to block the peaceful transition of power." On the Capitol attack, which injured 140 officers, Smith said Trump was "by a large measure the most culpable" and responsible for crimes committed for his benefit. He expressed regret only for not better appreciating his team's sacrifices, many of whom were later fired.

Democrats, including Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), defended Smith, with Goldman calling Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon, who blocked parts of Smith's report, "completely lawless." Smith anticipated retaliation from the Trump Justice Department, stating, "I will not be intimidated," and believed it might indict him. During the hearing, Trump posted on Truth Social: "Deranged Jack Smith is being DECIMATED before Congress... Jack Smith is a deranged animal, who shouldn’t be allowed to practice Law."

This hearing followed a closed-door deposition in December 2025, whose transcript Republicans released. Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) suggested recalling Smith on the classified documents case, as Cannon's order may lift, amid pushes for the report's release despite Trump's lawyer's objections over grand jury materials.

Cosa dice la gente

Reactions on X to Jack Smith's January 22, 2026, testimony before the House Judiciary Committee on his Trump investigations are polarized. Left-leaning users and Democrats praised Smith for standing by evidence of Trump's criminal conduct in election subversion and classified documents cases, sharing clips of his firm statements. Conservative accounts claimed Republicans dismantled Smith's credibility, citing rushed pre-election timelines, hearsay reliance, and political motivations. Journalists noted tense exchanges and Democratic requests for additional hearings on the documents case.

Articoli correlati

Illustration of Jack Smith testifying in deposition, defending Trump-related prosecutions with Jan. 6 quote and symbolic imagery.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Transcript shows Jack Smith defending Trump prosecutions and saying Jan. 6 ‘does not happen’ without him

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA Verificato

A House committee has released a transcript and video of former special counsel Jack Smith’s closed-door December deposition, in which he defended the Justice Department investigations that led to federal indictments of Donald Trump related to the 2020 election and classified documents.

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley on Wednesday released records from an FBI-DOJ investigation code-named Arctic Frost, including 197 subpoenas. The Biden-era probe, which Grassley says later fed Special Counsel Jack Smith’s election case, sought information related to more than 400 Republican-aligned people and entities. Republican critics, including Sens. Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham, likened the effort to a political enemies list and compared it to Watergate.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

Speaking at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on Nov. 15, Sen. Adam Schiff argued it was “absurd” to claim the Biden-era Justice Department was weaponized, pointing to then–Attorney General Merrick Garland’s reputation as a nonpartisan actor.

A Daily Wire article speculates on a hypothetical White House 'naughty list' featuring eight lawmakers from both parties who have criticized or obstructed President Donald Trump's administration in 2025. The piece details their actions, including protests, social media attacks, and policy disputes. It portrays these figures as unified in opposition to Trump.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

A Georgia judge has dismissed the criminal case against President Donald Trump and several allies over their alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results in the state, after the new prosecutor in charge moved to drop the charges. The decision ends the last major criminal prosecution against Trump related to the 2020 election, following the disqualification of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.

President Donald Trump has filed a 96-page appeal with a New York appellate court seeking to overturn his felony conviction in the Manhattan hush money case, arguing the trial improperly relied on evidence tied to his official acts and that the judge should have recused himself.

Riportato dall'IA Verificato

Sports journalist Stephen A. Smith has sharply criticized Senator Mark Kelly for appearing in a video in which Democratic lawmakers with military backgrounds tell service members they can and must refuse illegal orders from the Trump administration. The video, released last week, warns of threats to the Constitution from within the United States, a message Smith questioned as an appropriate direct appeal to troops.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta