Supreme Court urges mediation for warring couples in disputes

The Supreme Court stated on Tuesday that warring couples cannot treat courts as battlefields to settle scores. While dissolving a marriage of a couple who lived together for only 65 days and have been separated for over a decade, the court emphasized mediation for early resolution.

A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Manmohan of the Supreme Court made these observations while dissolving a marriage in a matrimonial dispute, where the couple had lived together for only 65 days before separating over a decade ago. The court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the union, citing an irretrievable breakdown.

The bench remarked, “Warring couples cannot be allowed to settle their scores by treating courts as their battlefield and choke the system. If there is no compatibility, there are modes available for early resolution of disputes. Process of mediation is the mode which can be explored at the stage of pre-litigation and even after litigation starts. When the parties start litigating against each other, especially on the criminal side, the chances of reunion are remote but should not be ruled out.”

The court highlighted that false allegations are rampant in matrimonial cases, with evidence often collected or even fabricated, particularly in the era of artificial intelligence. Issues frequently escalate after the birth of a child, turning the child into a point of contention. It urged parties to attempt pre-litigation mediation, guided by advocates who may need counseling themselves, and to utilize mediation centers available in all districts.

Even for minor matters like maintenance under Section 144 of the BNSS, 2023, or Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, courts should first explore mediation rather than proceeding to replies, as counter-allegations can worsen disputes. In police complaints over simple matrimonial issues, reconciliation through court mediation centers should be prioritized over summoning parties to stations. With matrimonial litigation surging in changing times, the court stressed that all involved, including family members, must strive to resolve disputes before initiating civil or criminal proceedings. Mediation has shown encouraging success rates, with some couples reuniting post-resolution.

Articoli correlati

Realistic illustration depicting empty seats at the divorce mediation hearing of Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil, represented by lawyers at Bandung Religious Court.
Immagine generata dall'IA

Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil absent from divorce mediation hearing

Riportato dall'IA Immagine generata dall'IA

The first mediation hearing for Atalia Praratya's divorce petition against Ridwan Kamil took place at Bandung Religious Court on December 17, 2025, but neither attended and were represented by lawyers. Atalia was absent due to official duties, while Ridwan was out of town. The petition does not include claims for division of joint assets.

China's Supreme People's Court released guidelines on Friday to prioritize collaborative mediation over litigation in resolving social and commercial disputes. The initiative partners with 20 institutions to address conflicts in areas like real estate, labor, and intellectual property before they reach courts. It aims to enhance public welfare and social stability.

Riportato dall'IA

The Calcutta High Court has directed an estranged Indian-Canadian couple to resolve their conflict through mutual dialogue to safeguard their five-year-old daughter's future. Justice Debangsu Basak emphasized that the court has no interest in the parents' dispute but is focused on the child's well-being. The bench suggested direct communication via video calls and arrangements for the child's return to Canada.

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition by former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti on Tuesday, seeking the transfer of undertrials from J&K imprisoned outside the union territory to local jails. The court cited ambiguity and political motives behind the plea. The petition also demanded access protocols for families and lawyers.

Riportato dall'IA

The Delhi High Court has observed that refusing to marry after establishing physical relations, citing mismatched horoscopes, could constitute the offence of sexual intercourse by deceit or on false promise of marriage. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma made this remark on February 17 while denying bail to an accused in a rape case.

Bomb threats received via email led to the temporary suspension of proceedings in several Mumbai courts, including the Bombay High Court and its Nagpur bench, on Thursday. Court officials followed evacuation protocols, assembling all judges in a designated area until police and bomb disposal squads declared the premises safe. No adverse orders were issued against those unable to attend due to the disruption.

Riportato dall'IA

India's Supreme Court has agreed to consider a plea by Sanatani Sangsad highlighting violence in West Bengal after the 2021 state polls. The application seeks a high-level monitoring committee chaired by a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the state's law and order machinery. The bench directed the petitioner to implead the CBI as a party.

 

 

 

Questo sito web utilizza i cookie

Utilizziamo i cookie per l'analisi per migliorare il nostro sito. Leggi la nostra politica sulla privacy per ulteriori informazioni.
Rifiuta