Supreme Court urges mediation for warring couples in disputes

The Supreme Court stated on Tuesday that warring couples cannot treat courts as battlefields to settle scores. While dissolving a marriage of a couple who lived together for only 65 days and have been separated for over a decade, the court emphasized mediation for early resolution.

A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Manmohan of the Supreme Court made these observations while dissolving a marriage in a matrimonial dispute, where the couple had lived together for only 65 days before separating over a decade ago. The court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the union, citing an irretrievable breakdown.

The bench remarked, “Warring couples cannot be allowed to settle their scores by treating courts as their battlefield and choke the system. If there is no compatibility, there are modes available for early resolution of disputes. Process of mediation is the mode which can be explored at the stage of pre-litigation and even after litigation starts. When the parties start litigating against each other, especially on the criminal side, the chances of reunion are remote but should not be ruled out.”

The court highlighted that false allegations are rampant in matrimonial cases, with evidence often collected or even fabricated, particularly in the era of artificial intelligence. Issues frequently escalate after the birth of a child, turning the child into a point of contention. It urged parties to attempt pre-litigation mediation, guided by advocates who may need counseling themselves, and to utilize mediation centers available in all districts.

Even for minor matters like maintenance under Section 144 of the BNSS, 2023, or Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, courts should first explore mediation rather than proceeding to replies, as counter-allegations can worsen disputes. In police complaints over simple matrimonial issues, reconciliation through court mediation centers should be prioritized over summoning parties to stations. With matrimonial litigation surging in changing times, the court stressed that all involved, including family members, must strive to resolve disputes before initiating civil or criminal proceedings. Mediation has shown encouraging success rates, with some couples reuniting post-resolution.

Relaterade artiklar

Realistic illustration depicting empty seats at the divorce mediation hearing of Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil, represented by lawyers at Bandung Religious Court.
Bild genererad av AI

Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil absent from divorce mediation hearing

Rapporterad av AI Bild genererad av AI

The first mediation hearing for Atalia Praratya's divorce petition against Ridwan Kamil took place at Bandung Religious Court on December 17, 2025, but neither attended and were represented by lawyers. Atalia was absent due to official duties, while Ridwan was out of town. The petition does not include claims for division of joint assets.

China's Supreme People's Court released guidelines on Friday to prioritize collaborative mediation over litigation in resolving social and commercial disputes. The initiative partners with 20 institutions to address conflicts in areas like real estate, labor, and intellectual property before they reach courts. It aims to enhance public welfare and social stability.

Rapporterad av AI

The Calcutta High Court has directed an estranged Indian-Canadian couple to resolve their conflict through mutual dialogue to safeguard their five-year-old daughter's future. Justice Debangsu Basak emphasized that the court has no interest in the parents' dispute but is focused on the child's well-being. The bench suggested direct communication via video calls and arrangements for the child's return to Canada.

The Bandung Religious Court granted Atalia Praratya's divorce petition against Ridwan Kamil on January 7, 2026, via an electronic hearing. The divorce was agreed amicably without open conflict or third-party involvement, with asset division and child custody settled beforehand. Ridwan Kamil described the separation as the best path after 29 years of marriage.

Rapporterad av AI

The Supreme Court asked the Haryana government whether it wants to decline sanction to prosecute Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad over his social media posts. The court nudged the state to take a sympathetic view on the matter.

Officials from the Tamil Nadu Archaeology Department surveyed a contested stone pillar at Thiruparankundram hill on December 10, amid legal disputes over lighting the Karthigai Deepam near a dargah. Justice S Srimathy of the Madras High Court Madurai Bench allowed a regulated hunger strike by local residents on December 13 to press for the ritual. The survey has drawn objections, with petitioners arguing it generates new evidence while the matter remains sub judice.

Rapporterad av AI

An investigation reveals that in nearly seven years since Uttarakhand enacted its Freedom of Religion Act, all five cases that reached full trial have ended in acquittals due to lack of evidence of coercion. Courts have highlighted gaps in police probes and consensual relationships in many instances. The law, aimed at curbing forced conversions, has seen rising registrations but limited convictions.

 

 

 

Denna webbplats använder cookies

Vi använder cookies för analys för att förbättra vår webbplats. Läs vår integritetspolicy för mer information.
Avböj