Supreme Court urges mediation for warring couples in disputes

The Supreme Court stated on Tuesday that warring couples cannot treat courts as battlefields to settle scores. While dissolving a marriage of a couple who lived together for only 65 days and have been separated for over a decade, the court emphasized mediation for early resolution.

A bench of Justices Rajesh Bindal and Manmohan of the Supreme Court made these observations while dissolving a marriage in a matrimonial dispute, where the couple had lived together for only 65 days before separating over a decade ago. The court invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve the union, citing an irretrievable breakdown.

The bench remarked, “Warring couples cannot be allowed to settle their scores by treating courts as their battlefield and choke the system. If there is no compatibility, there are modes available for early resolution of disputes. Process of mediation is the mode which can be explored at the stage of pre-litigation and even after litigation starts. When the parties start litigating against each other, especially on the criminal side, the chances of reunion are remote but should not be ruled out.”

The court highlighted that false allegations are rampant in matrimonial cases, with evidence often collected or even fabricated, particularly in the era of artificial intelligence. Issues frequently escalate after the birth of a child, turning the child into a point of contention. It urged parties to attempt pre-litigation mediation, guided by advocates who may need counseling themselves, and to utilize mediation centers available in all districts.

Even for minor matters like maintenance under Section 144 of the BNSS, 2023, or Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, courts should first explore mediation rather than proceeding to replies, as counter-allegations can worsen disputes. In police complaints over simple matrimonial issues, reconciliation through court mediation centers should be prioritized over summoning parties to stations. With matrimonial litigation surging in changing times, the court stressed that all involved, including family members, must strive to resolve disputes before initiating civil or criminal proceedings. Mediation has shown encouraging success rates, with some couples reuniting post-resolution.

Artigos relacionados

Realistic illustration depicting empty seats at the divorce mediation hearing of Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil, represented by lawyers at Bandung Religious Court.
Imagem gerada por IA

Atalia Praratya and Ridwan Kamil absent from divorce mediation hearing

Reportado por IA Imagem gerada por IA

The first mediation hearing for Atalia Praratya's divorce petition against Ridwan Kamil took place at Bandung Religious Court on December 17, 2025, but neither attended and were represented by lawyers. Atalia was absent due to official duties, while Ridwan was out of town. The petition does not include claims for division of joint assets.

China's Supreme People's Court released guidelines on Friday to prioritize collaborative mediation over litigation in resolving social and commercial disputes. The initiative partners with 20 institutions to address conflicts in areas like real estate, labor, and intellectual property before they reach courts. It aims to enhance public welfare and social stability.

Reportado por IA

The Calcutta High Court has directed an estranged Indian-Canadian couple to resolve their conflict through mutual dialogue to safeguard their five-year-old daughter's future. Justice Debangsu Basak emphasized that the court has no interest in the parents' dispute but is focused on the child's well-being. The bench suggested direct communication via video calls and arrangements for the child's return to Canada.

The Supreme Court asked the Haryana government whether it wants to decline sanction to prosecute Ashoka University professor Ali Khan Mahmudabad over his social media posts. The court nudged the state to take a sympathetic view on the matter.

Reportado por IA

O judiciário do Quénia anunciou planos para abrir sessões de tribunal aos sábados para infrações menores, a fim de melhorar o acesso à justiça e reduzir o acúmulo de casos.

An investigation reveals that in nearly seven years since Uttarakhand enacted its Freedom of Religion Act, all five cases that reached full trial have ended in acquittals due to lack of evidence of coercion. Courts have highlighted gaps in police probes and consensual relationships in many instances. The law, aimed at curbing forced conversions, has seen rising registrations but limited convictions.

Reportado por IA

O Tribunal Superior em Nakuru emitiu uma ordem impedindo todas as repartições públicas quenianas de contratar firmas de advocacia privadas. Os ativistas Okiya Omtatah e Dr. Magare Gikenyi apresentaram a petição, argumentando que é inconstitucional usar dinheiro dos contribuintes em advogados externos quando há pessoal jurídico qualificado disponível. A Ordem dos Advogados do Quênia condenou a decisão.

quarta-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2026, 22:56h

Delhi high court seeks centre's reply on embryo adoption ban challenge

domingo, 04 de janeiro de 2026, 16:16h

Kenyan divorce laws consider property and spousal contributions

sábado, 27 de dezembro de 2025, 06:24h

Supreme Court schedules hearing to revisit Aravalli hills definition

sexta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2025, 08:12h

Pune couple divorces within 24 hours of marriage

terça-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2025, 13:33h

J&K high court dismisses Mehbooba Mufti's plea on undertrials

terça-feira, 23 de dezembro de 2025, 13:16h

Advogados Havi e Grand Mullah miram Koome e juízes principais

quinta-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2025, 10:57h

Bomb threats halt Bombay High Court proceedings

sexta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2025, 17:43h

Tamil Nadu archaeology department surveys disputed Madurai temple site

quarta-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2025, 04:40h

Mother urges Bombay HC to summon Fadnavis over custodial death policy gap

domingo, 23 de novembro de 2025, 21:00h

Justice Surya Kant sworn in as India's 53rd chief justice

 

 

 

Este site usa cookies

Usamos cookies para análise para melhorar nosso site. Leia nossa política de privacidade para mais informações.
Recusar