Concerns raised over VP lawyers' possible conflict of interest

The House public accounts panel and Bicol Saro Rep. Terry Ridon have raised concerns over a potential conflict of interest, as two members of Vice President Sara Duterte's legal team in the ongoing impeachment proceedings could serve as witnesses in the handling of confidential funds. Ridon stated that including Michael Poa and Reynold Munsayac on the defense panel raises serious questions due to their direct involvement in issues surrounding the confidential funds of the Office of the Vice President and the Department of Education.

In Manila, the House public accounts panel and Bicol Saro Rep. Terry Ridon expressed concerns yesterday regarding a potential conflict of interest involving Vice President Sara Duterte's legal team in the ongoing impeachment proceedings. According to reports, two members of this team, Michael Poa and Reynold Munsayac, have been identified as possible witnesses in the examination of confidential funds handling.

Ridon stated in a release, 'If these lawyers possess firsthand knowledge of the transactions or decisions under scrutiny, they may eventually have to testify under oath.' Poa served as spokesperson for the Department of Education during Duterte's tenure as its chief, a period when the agency received hundreds of millions of pesos in confidential funds that later faced congressional review over their disbursement and liquidation. Meanwhile, Munsayac acted as spokesperson for the Vice President and as DepEd Assistant Secretary for Procurement.

Duterte's defense team is led by veteran counsel Sigfrid Fortun, supported by associates from the Fortun Narvasa and Salazar Law Office. No response from Duterte's camp to these concerns was mentioned in the report.

関連記事

Illustration of Philippine Supreme Court ruling Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment unconstitutional, courtroom scene with justices, defendant, and documents.
AIによって生成された画像

Supreme court affirms sara duterte impeachment unconstitutional

AIによるレポート AIによって生成された画像

The supreme court has ruled that the 2025 impeachment against vice president sara duterte was unconstitutional due to procedural flaws. This decision does not clear her of wrongdoing but blocks the process for now. New complaints have already been filed by progressive groups.

サラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領の弁護団は、下院司法委員会における同氏の弾劾手続きを停止するよう最高裁に請願を行った団体から一切相談を受けていなかった。ドゥテルテ氏の弁護人を務めるマイケル・ポア氏は、突然の申し立てに驚きを隠せない様子を見せている。同委員会は4月に公聴会を予定している。

AIによるレポート

The possible testimony of alleged former bagman Ramil Madriaga could prove crucial in the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte, a lawmaker said. Rep. Terry Ridon hopes it will clarify the identities behind bogus names linked to confidential funds. Madriaga is ready to testify before Congress or other bodies.

The House Committee on Justice ruled on March 4, 2026, that the two impeachment complaints against Vice President Sara Duterte—filed in early February and transmitted to the Speaker's office—are sufficient in substance, voting 54-1 to advance proceedings. Duterte has 10 days to respond. Separately, she filed a perjury complaint against former intelligence officer Ramil Madriaga, whose affidavit supported the complaints.

AIによるレポート

サンファン市選出のベル・サモラ下院議員は、下院司法委員会がサラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領の弾劾手続きを進めるための強固な証拠を有しており、上院での審理に必要な賛成票を確保できるとの見方を示した。同議員によると、弾劾訴追には下院の3分の1にあたる約106票が必要であり、現時点でその数は確保できているという。一方、ドゥテルテ副大統領側は手続きの停止を求めて最高裁判所に申し立てを行っている。

バタンガス州選出のジェルヴィル・ルイストロ下院議員は、サラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領に対する弾劾訴追案をめぐる下院司法委員会の採決において、票の買収や賄賂が影響したとの見方を否定した。同氏は、ナボタス州選出のトビー・ティアンコ下院議員が主張した疑念に反論している。同委員会は3月25日から予備調査を開始する予定である。

AIによるレポート

下院は、支持者らが最高裁判所に申し立てを行ったにもかかわらず、来月からサラ・ドゥテルテ副大統領に対する弾劾手続きを継続する。議員らは、司法委員会が1987年憲法および下院規則に従うことを明言した。現在、訴追事由の有無を判断するための事実確認聴聞会が進められている。

 

 

 

このウェブサイトはCookieを使用します

サイトを改善するための分析にCookieを使用します。詳細については、プライバシーポリシーをお読みください。
拒否