Judge Cannon blocks Jack Smith’s report on Trump documents

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ruled against the release of a report compiled by former special counsel Jack Smith regarding President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. Cannon described Smith’s efforts as a brazen attempt to circumvent her prior dismissal of charges against Trump. The decision emphasizes principles of fairness and justice in the absence of a guilt adjudication.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, issued a ruling on Monday denying former special counsel Jack Smith’s request to release a report on Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents after he left office in January 2021. Cannon dismissed the related charges against Trump in July 2024, citing violations of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause and improper authorization of Smith’s office.

Despite the dismissal, Cannon noted that Smith continued to investigate and compile the report, intended for transmission to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Congress, and others. She wrote that Smith’s team “chose to circumvent it, for months, by taking the discovery generated in this case and compiling it in a final report.” Cannon added, “The Court need not countenance this brazen stratagem or effectively perpetuate the Special Counsel’s breach of this Court’s own order.”

The judge argued that releasing the report would “cause irreparable damage to former defendants from disclosure of non-public discovery material implicating still-contested grand jury and privilege concerns; and it would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges.” She highlighted that such a release would deny Trump and his co-defendants a meaningful opportunity to respond to the allegations.

Smith has claimed possession of “powerful evidence that showed Trump willfully retained highly classified documents” post-January 2021. However, Cannon observed that the court “strains to find a situation in which a former special counsel has released a report after initiating criminal charges that did not result in a finding of guilt,” especially where “the defendants contested the charges from the outset and still proclaim their innocence.”

Separately, Smith faced questions from lawmakers last month about his investigations into Trump. Charges related to the January 6 Capitol riot were dismissed after Trump’s election and before his return to office in January 2025.

관련 기사

Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Former FBI Director James Comey has told a federal appeals court that the Department of Justice cannot salvage its case against him due to an unlawful appointment of a prosecutor. Comey accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy, contrasting its stance here with its position in a prior Trump case. The dispute centers on Attorney General Pam Bondi's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney.

Republican senators pressed lawyers for Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Tuesday over the companies’ handling of subpoenas from special counsel Jack Smith’s office seeking phone toll records connected to congressional Republicans during the Justice Department’s 2020 election interference investigation.

AI에 의해 보고됨

Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the House Judiciary Committee on February 11, 2026, in a contentious oversight hearing marked by sharp exchanges with Democratic lawmakers. Democrats accused the Department of Justice of targeting political opponents and mishandling Jeffrey Epstein files, while Bondi defended her actions and criticized the questioning as theatrics. The session highlighted partisan tensions over the DOJ's direction under the Trump administration.

President Donald Trump removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her position at the Department of Justice on Thursday, April 2, ending her 14-month tenure amid bipartisan criticism over Jeffrey Epstein files, failed politicized investigations, mass DOJ firings, and strained relations with Mexico. Trump praised her on Truth Social as a 'great patriot' for crime crackdowns, appointing Deputy AG Todd Blanche as interim leader amid speculation on her permanent replacement.

AI에 의해 보고됨

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday that President Trump cannot use the International Economic Emergency Powers Act to impose broad-scale tariffs, prompting immediate responses from the administration and political figures. Trump signed a 15% global tariff under a different law the next day and criticized the court on Monday. The decision has sparked debates over its political implications ahead of the midterms and the State of the Union address.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부