Judge Cannon blocks Jack Smith’s report on Trump documents

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ruled against the release of a report compiled by former special counsel Jack Smith regarding President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. Cannon described Smith’s efforts as a brazen attempt to circumvent her prior dismissal of charges against Trump. The decision emphasizes principles of fairness and justice in the absence of a guilt adjudication.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, issued a ruling on Monday denying former special counsel Jack Smith’s request to release a report on Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents after he left office in January 2021. Cannon dismissed the related charges against Trump in July 2024, citing violations of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause and improper authorization of Smith’s office.

Despite the dismissal, Cannon noted that Smith continued to investigate and compile the report, intended for transmission to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Congress, and others. She wrote that Smith’s team “chose to circumvent it, for months, by taking the discovery generated in this case and compiling it in a final report.” Cannon added, “The Court need not countenance this brazen stratagem or effectively perpetuate the Special Counsel’s breach of this Court’s own order.”

The judge argued that releasing the report would “cause irreparable damage to former defendants from disclosure of non-public discovery material implicating still-contested grand jury and privilege concerns; and it would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges.” She highlighted that such a release would deny Trump and his co-defendants a meaningful opportunity to respond to the allegations.

Smith has claimed possession of “powerful evidence that showed Trump willfully retained highly classified documents” post-January 2021. However, Cannon observed that the court “strains to find a situation in which a former special counsel has released a report after initiating criminal charges that did not result in a finding of guilt,” especially where “the defendants contested the charges from the outset and still proclaim their innocence.”

Separately, Smith faced questions from lawmakers last month about his investigations into Trump. Charges related to the January 6 Capitol riot were dismissed after Trump’s election and before his return to office in January 2025.

관련 기사

Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

AI에 의해 보고됨 AI에 의해 생성된 이미지

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

AI에 의해 보고됨 사실 확인됨

A House committee has released a transcript and video of former special counsel Jack Smith’s closed-door December deposition, in which he defended the Justice Department investigations that led to federal indictments of Donald Trump related to the 2020 election and classified documents.

President Donald Trump's Justice Department faces a turbulent week marked by investigations into political foes and internal frustrations. Attorney General Pam Bondi is under scrutiny as Trump pushes for aggressive pursuits against his critics. Resignations and probes highlight deepening tensions within the administration.

AI에 의해 보고됨

A nonprofit advocating for law clerks has filed a misconduct complaint against Judge Sarah Merriam of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, alleging she bullies and mistreats her staff. The complaint, based on accounts from former clerks, highlights a pattern of abusive behavior in her chambers. This marks the second such public complaint against her in four years.

A federal judge in New York has sharply criticized Immigration and Customs Enforcement for deceptive practices and brutal confinement of a detainee. In a detailed ruling, Judge Gary R. Brown ordered the release of Erron Anthony Clarke, citing violations that shock the conscience. The decision highlights growing judicial frustration with federal agents' conduct in immigration cases.

AI에 의해 보고됨 사실 확인됨

Speaking at the Texas Tribune Festival in Austin on Nov. 15, Sen. Adam Schiff argued it was “absurd” to claim the Biden-era Justice Department was weaponized, pointing to then–Attorney General Merrick Garland’s reputation as a nonpartisan actor.

 

 

 

이 웹사이트는 쿠키를 사용합니다

사이트를 개선하기 위해 분석을 위한 쿠키를 사용합니다. 자세한 내용은 개인정보 보호 정책을 읽으세요.
거부