Judge Cannon blocks Jack Smith’s report on Trump documents

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ruled against the release of a report compiled by former special counsel Jack Smith regarding President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents. Cannon described Smith’s efforts as a brazen attempt to circumvent her prior dismissal of charges against Trump. The decision emphasizes principles of fairness and justice in the absence of a guilt adjudication.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, appointed by Trump, issued a ruling on Monday denying former special counsel Jack Smith’s request to release a report on Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents after he left office in January 2021. Cannon dismissed the related charges against Trump in July 2024, citing violations of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause and improper authorization of Smith’s office.

Despite the dismissal, Cannon noted that Smith continued to investigate and compile the report, intended for transmission to then-Attorney General Merrick Garland, Congress, and others. She wrote that Smith’s team “chose to circumvent it, for months, by taking the discovery generated in this case and compiling it in a final report.” Cannon added, “The Court need not countenance this brazen stratagem or effectively perpetuate the Special Counsel’s breach of this Court’s own order.”

The judge argued that releasing the report would “cause irreparable damage to former defendants from disclosure of non-public discovery material implicating still-contested grand jury and privilege concerns; and it would contravene basic notions of fairness and justice in the process, where no adjudication of guilt has been reached following initiation of criminal charges.” She highlighted that such a release would deny Trump and his co-defendants a meaningful opportunity to respond to the allegations.

Smith has claimed possession of “powerful evidence that showed Trump willfully retained highly classified documents” post-January 2021. However, Cannon observed that the court “strains to find a situation in which a former special counsel has released a report after initiating criminal charges that did not result in a finding of guilt,” especially where “the defendants contested the charges from the outset and still proclaim their innocence.”

Separately, Smith faced questions from lawmakers last month about his investigations into Trump. Charges related to the January 6 Capitol riot were dismissed after Trump’s election and before his return to office in January 2025.

Relaterte artikler

Jack Smith testifies at House Judiciary Committee hearing on dismissed Trump investigations, amid Republican accusations and Democratic support.
Bilde generert av AI

Jack Smith testifies on Trump investigations in House hearing

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended his investigations into President Donald Trump during a contentious House Judiciary Committee hearing on January 22, 2026. Republicans accused the probes of political bias and overreach, while Democrats praised Smith's adherence to facts and law. The testimony marked Smith's first public appearance on the matter after two indictments were dismissed following Trump's election victory.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon has ordered the Department of Justice not to release former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on the investigation into classified documents taken by Donald Trump. The ruling, issued this week, revives Cannon's earlier stance that Smith's appointment was invalid. Critics argue the decision lacks jurisdiction and contradicts historical precedent for such reports.

Rapportert av AI

Former FBI Director James Comey has told a federal appeals court that the Department of Justice cannot salvage its case against him due to an unlawful appointment of a prosecutor. Comey accuses the DOJ of hypocrisy, contrasting its stance here with its position in a prior Trump case. The dispute centers on Attorney General Pam Bondi's appointment of Lindsey Halligan as interim U.S. attorney.

A federal judge in West Virginia has issued a stern warning to officials, stating that continued illegal detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement will lead to contempt proceedings and sanctions without qualified immunity. The ruling comes in a habeas corpus case involving Miguel Antonio Dominguez Izaguirre, whose detention was deemed a violation of due process rights. This decision highlights ongoing judicial rejections of the government's interpretation of immigration detention laws.

Rapportert av AI Faktasjekket

Republican senators pressed lawyers for Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile at a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing Tuesday over the companies’ handling of subpoenas from special counsel Jack Smith’s office seeking phone toll records connected to congressional Republicans during the Justice Department’s 2020 election interference investigation.

Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick J. Schiltz has warned of criminal contempt proceedings against the Trump administration for repeated violations of court orders in immigration cases. The judge expressed frustration over the government's failure to comply with directives related to ICE detentions following Operation Metro Surge. This comes amid overwhelming caseloads for federal attorneys handling the fallout.

Rapportert av AI

President Donald Trump removed Attorney General Pam Bondi from her position at the Department of Justice on Thursday, April 2, ending her 14-month tenure amid bipartisan criticism over Jeffrey Epstein files, failed politicized investigations, mass DOJ firings, and strained relations with Mexico. Trump praised her on Truth Social as a 'great patriot' for crime crackdowns, appointing Deputy AG Todd Blanche as interim leader amid speculation on her permanent replacement.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis