Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs executive order postponing U.S. House primaries after Supreme Court strikes down congressional map.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signs executive order postponing U.S. House primaries after Supreme Court strikes down congressional map.
Bilde generert av AI

Louisiana Gov. Landry postpones House primaries after Supreme Court Callais ruling on congressional map

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (R) postponed the state's U.S. House primaries until at least mid-July via emergency executive order following the Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, which struck down the congressional map as unconstitutional under the Voting Rights Act. The move, praised by President Trump and Speaker Mike Johnson but challenged by a lawsuit, has caused voter confusion amid ongoing early voting for other races, as Republicans eye redistricting gains.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that the state's congressional map—with two majority-Black districts out of six, despite Black residents comprising ~33% of the population—violated the Voting Rights Act through racial gerrymandering and imposed a heavy burden on Section 2 claims (see prior coverage in this series). Justice Elena Kagan's dissent warned it rendered Section 2 'all but a dead letter.'

Gov. Jeff Landry responded on April 30 with an executive order suspending House primaries originally set for May 16 (with early voting underway), shifting them to July 15 or until new maps are drawn, while sparing the Senate primary and other races—early voting for which began Saturday. Landry framed it as upholding 'the rule of law.' President Donald Trump praised his 'Vision, Strength, and Leadership' on social media, and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) backed it, suggesting a November 'jungle' primary.

A lawsuit filed late Thursday challenges Landry's authority. Local officials, like Winn Parish registrar Bryan Kelley, called it 'crazy and confusing' but are informing voters via flyers and meetings. David Becker of the Center for Election Innovation and Research highlighted voter disruption: 'Every voter in Louisiana right now doesn’t know whether this election is going to go on or not.' Absentee ballots already distributed add to chaos; Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) called proceeding with other races 'disappointing' and urged clarity.

Republicans see a chance to redraw for a 6-0 GOP edge based on 'shared interests and regional commonalities' (Rep. Thomas Pressly), eliminating majority-minority districts before 2026 midterms. Democrats decried it as 'completely anti-Democratic' (candidate Matt Gromlich) and a 'redistricting power grab' (Marc Elias). Critics like Janai Nelson of the Legal Defense Fund labeled the ruling 'catastrophic' for Black representation. In contrast, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp said his state won't redraw before its May 19 primary but anticipates changes by 2028.

Hva folk sier

X discussions on Louisiana Gov. Landry's postponement of U.S. House primaries after the Supreme Court's Callais ruling show partisan divide: conservatives celebrate it as a win against unconstitutional race-based maps, urging other red states to follow; liberals criticize it as a grotesque assault on democracy enabling GOP gerrymandering amid voter confusion; journalists report factually on the executive order and its context.

Relaterte artikler

Illustration of Supreme Court ruling against Louisiana redistricting map
Bilde generert av AI

Supreme Court strikes down Louisiana congressional map, tightening limits on race-conscious redistricting

Rapportert av AI Bilde generert av AI Faktasjekket

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6–3 on April 29, 2026, in Louisiana v. Callais that Louisiana’s congressional map (SB8) was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, concluding the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to draw an additional majority-Black district. Sen. Raphael Warnock, D-Ga., called the ruling “a massive and devastating blow,” warning it could accelerate redistricting fights across Southern states ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, decision in Louisiana v. Callais declaring the state's congressional map an unconstitutional racial gerrymander (as covered previously in this series), Louisiana has suspended its upcoming primaries for U.S. House races. The ruling affects one of the state's two Democratic-held majority-Black districts. Other primaries, including U.S. Senate, proceed May 16.

Rapportert av AI

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's April 29, 2026, Callais v. Louisiana decision striking down Louisiana's congressional map as a racial gerrymander (as covered in this series), experts warn the reinterpretation of Voting Rights Act protections could endanger minority representation nationwide. Louisiana has extended suspension of its U.S. House primaries until at least July 2026 amid expectations of a redraw.

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling on April 29 that significantly limited the reach of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The decision in Louisiana v. Callais has prompted several states to redraw congressional maps. Lawmakers in affected states have cited partisan reasons for the changes.

Rapportert av AI

In a follow-up to its April 29 ruling in Callais v. Louisiana, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an unsigned order on May 5 allowing the decision—striking down the state's congressional map as a racial gerrymander—to take effect immediately. Justice Samuel Alito, in a concurrence, sharply criticized Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's lone dissent as 'baseless' and 'insulting,' highlighting tensions amid 2026 election battles.

A POLITICO/Public First survey conducted May 9–11 finds a plurality of Democrats say their party should respond to Republican redistricting efforts even if it results in fewer majority-minority districts. The results come weeks after the Supreme Court’s April 29 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which narrowed how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act can be used in redistricting disputes.

Rapportert av AI

Virginia Democrats filed a lawsuit with the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday seeking to overturn a state court decision that struck down a voter-approved congressional map. The move comes after the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais effectively weakened the Voting Rights Act, prompting several Southern states to redraw districts.

 

 

 

Dette nettstedet bruker informasjonskapsler

Vi bruker informasjonskapsler for analyse for å forbedre nettstedet vårt. Les vår personvernerklæring for mer informasjon.
Avvis